Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to new and material evidence received by the Veteran, which relates to his left ear hearing loss. The issues of service connection for left ear hearing loss and entitlement to a compensable rating for right ear hearing loss are inextricably intertwined and must be adjudicated together.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's right ear hearing loss was noted at entry into service and is not presumed to have been incurred in service. The Board has ordered a new VA examination to determine if the pre-existing condition worsened during active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus have been granted.,The Board found the evidence at least evenly balanced as to whether the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus are related to in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus due to insufficient consideration of scientific articles submitted by the Veteran in his Notice of Disagreement.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's TDIU claim is granted as his service-connected bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to the need for updated VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that there was no evidence of a chronic disability in service or within a presumptive period, and continuity of symptomatology is not established. The Board concluded that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is less likely than not caused by or a result of in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability, finding that there was no evidence to support a relationship between his current hearing loss and in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to March 13, 2017 for service connection of type II diabetes mellitus, tinnitus, and right ear hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is at least as likely as not related to his noise exposure during service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including coronary artery disease, bilateral hearing loss, rheumatoid arthritis, tinnitus, hypertension, beriberi, and irritable bowel syndrome are denied as there is no recognized period of active military service during which these conditions could have been incurred or aggravated.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, OSA, lumbar spine strain, migraine headaches, and duodenal ulcer were denied. The claim for increased rating of right lower extremity radiculopathy was remanded. Service connection for chronic fatigue, hypertension, hepatitis C, and an acquired psychiatric disorder (depressive disorder with anxious distress) is also remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there is no evidence of a causal relationship between these conditions and his in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has restored the 20 percent rating for bilateral hearing loss, but has also remanded the issue of entitlement to a rating in excess of 20 percent due to insufficient information from private audiological examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to the need for updated VA examination and treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and an effective date earlier than September 24, 2012 for right knee DJD and thoracolumbar spine DDD with sciatica were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support earlier effective dates as there was no formal or informal claim received prior to September 24, 2012.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment, thus denying his claim for TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to his service-connected disabilities, finding that they do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's hearing loss is related to service, but the Board finds that there is insufficient evidence regarding his tinnitus and remands for further examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's tinnitus is related to service exposure, and the Board grants service connection.,The Veteran's ischemic heart disease is presumed due to his Vietnam-era service, and the Board grants service connection.,There is insufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran has bilateral hearing loss or its etiology.,The claim for erectile dysfunction is remanded as it may be related to ischemic heart disease.,The Veteran's nervous tremors are remanded due to lack of clarity in the medical records and need for further examination.,The Veteran's neuropathy of the lower extremities is remanded for a determination on its etiology, including potential connection to service exposure.,The Veteran's memory loss is remanded as it needs clarification regarding its relationship to service.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.