Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Board finds that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not related to his military service or his service-connected epilepsy. The most probative evidence indicates that the current condition does not have a direct link to either.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated as noncompensable, and the Board finds that a higher initial evaluation for this disability is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, and his peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities was not incurred in or caused by active military service. His skin disability, hypertension, and sleep apnea were also not supported by evidence showing they were related to his service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Veteran's tinnitus and dermatitis of the face, groin, stomach, and mid-section are found to be related to service. The right ankle disability is not currently diagnosed or linked to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2017
The Veteran has withdrawn all issues on appeal, including those seeking service connection for various conditions and disabilities. The Board does not have jurisdiction to further consider these matters.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are found to be due to service, with the Board granting service connection for both conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's request to reopen his claim of service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that the new evidence submitted did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2017
The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal for the above issues, and thus the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2017
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeal regarding the issue of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his active military service, granting service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Veteran's appeals for service connection have been dismissed due to withdrawal of the claims. The claim of service connection for a cardiovascular disorder, neurological disorder, and right ankle disability has been denied. The claim seeking an effective date earlier than November 30, 2010, for the grant of service connection for a right ankle disability has also been denied. The Veteran's claim of service connection for fatigue (manifested by chronic fatigue syndrome) was not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence. Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is granted. Service connection for skin disorder and multi-joint pain (fibromyalgia) are denied. Service connection for a sleep disorder (manifested by sleep apnea) is also denied. The Veteran's headaches, right elbow disability, intermittent diarrhea, and right ankle disability have all been assigned the lowest possible rating of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2017
The Veteran's appeal for higher ratings for bilateral hearing loss disability has been withdrawn, resulting in the dismissal of this case.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding new and material evidence. The Board then determined that there is at least an equipoise of evidence to support a finding that these conditions were incurred in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Board found that the Veteran does not have a current right ear hearing loss disability for VA purposes and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is found to be etiologically related to in-service acoustic trauma. The issues of service connection for ruptured left and right eardrums are dismissed as the Veteran withdrew his appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss, erectile dysfunction, and headaches due to TBI were not incurred or aggravated during service. The evidence does not support a finding of continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds that it does not warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's current hearing loss and bilateral knee conditions are not related to service, as there is no evidence of in-service injury or disease. The VA examiners concluded that any current hearing loss and knee disabilities are more likely due to natural aging processes rather than service events.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2017
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board has determined that a higher rating of 40 percent is warranted as of February 18, 2015. The claim for an increased rating for residuals of an urachal cyst was not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2017
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.