Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records and arranging a VA examination. The appeal is now pending again with the Board.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus are service-connected, with the former being granted based on direct evidence of a current disability related to in-service noise exposure. The latter is presumed due to chronic disease manifested during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2016
The Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was rated at 10 percent effective September 22, 2015. The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for chronic kidney disease and stress, left ear hearing loss, and tinnitus. The decision found that the NOD regarding these issues was untimely filed.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2016
The Veteran's appeal for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss disability has been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Veteran does not have a current hearing loss disability in his left ear for VA compensation purposes, and therefore service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus should be remanded due to incomplete records, including missing service treatment records. The Veteran is asked to provide any additional medical evidence related to his conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are found to be related to his military service, specifically due to noise exposure during Reserve duty. Service connection is granted for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral ear disability and tinnitus, but these claims are being remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of the claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical evidence and development of his claims. The issues include increased ratings for bilateral hearing loss, knee degenerative joint disease with right knee anterior cruciate ligament tear status post surgery and left knee medial meniscus tear status post surgery, right ankle bone cyst status post excision and bone grafting, and left Achilles tendonitis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional medical inquiry due to a recent hearing loss examination not having been conducted in the last two years.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining records related to the Veteran's Worker's Compensation benefits and scheduling a VA examination. The examiner will provide opinions on whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was caused by or began during his military service, and if so, whether his service-connected tinnitus aggravated his hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Board denied service connection for tinnitus on a direct-incurrence basis and denied a compensable initial rating for bilateral hearing loss prior to February 23, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not service-connected as they did not develop due to in-service noise exposure. The VA examiner found that the current hearing loss is more likely related to occupational noise exposure post-service, rather than service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination and social and industrial survey to assess the severity of his service-connected PTSD and its impact on his employability.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability did not begin during or for several decades after his active duty service and was not otherwise caused by service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities meet the percentage requirements for a TDIU, and the evidence demonstrates that he is as likely as not unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2016
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral hearing loss, TDIU, and SMC are being remanded due to the need for additional development of evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hepatitis C is service-connected, as it was incurred during his military service due to risk factors such as high-risk sexual activity. The other issues regarding hearing loss and right elbow condition are granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for CUE in the August 2009 rating decision denying service connection for bilateral hearing loss and for an effective date earlier than September 26, 2008, for a separate 100 percent rating for obstructive-restrictive lung disease. The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in either decision.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.