Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss was denied prior to December 2, 2015. As of December 2, 2015, the Veteran meets the criteria for a 10% disability rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for bilateral hearing loss and increased (compensable) rating for right foot disability, finding that the current noncompensable ratings were appropriate based on audiometric testing results.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus type II with peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, residuals of status post right hemicolectomy secondary to bowel perforation from colonoscopy with status post ventral hernia repair and scar, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss, preclude him from obtaining substantially gainful employment. The Board has granted a TDIU based on this finding.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus had their onset in service, and thus granted service connection for these conditions. The claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded as it was not fully addressed.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his military service, including in-service noise exposure during active duty and ACDUTRA. As such, the claims for service connection have been granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus was found to have manifested within one year of his separation from service, and the Board granted service connection for this condition. The initial compensable disability evaluation for bilateral hearing loss is also granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be etiologically related to his service. The Board finds that the Veteran has a current diagnosis of bilateral hearing loss, which is related to active service due to hazardous noise exposure as per MOS classification. However, there is no definitive evidence linking the Veteran's prostate condition (claimed as prostate cancer) to his active service.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2016
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death, and no rating decision was made for the issue of service connection for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently evaluated at a 20 percent rating, and an increased rating in excess of this has been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to the need to obtain hearing test results from the Veteran's post-service employer at a brewery. The claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus will be reconsidered based on this new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Board determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by his active duty service, as there was no evidence of such conditions in service or within one year post-service. The VA medical examination did not find a nexus between the Veteran's loud noise exposure during service and his current disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2016
The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) for additional development and consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to the need for additional VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss was denied, and his tinnitus claim was not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the schedular criteria for a compensable disability rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss did not begin in service, is not related to active duty service, and therefore does not meet the criteria for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to in-service acoustic trauma, resolving reasonable doubt in his favor.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and an examination to assess the impact of his service-connected disabilities on his ability to work. The TDIU claim will be considered in light of this new evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development and adjudication, including obtaining a VA medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not caused by or aggravated by service, and the claim is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2016
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there is a reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran's assertions regarding the onset of these conditions during military service.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.