Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left ear sensorineural hearing loss is shown to have clearly and unmistakably existed prior to his third period of active service from February 1991 to March 1991, and was aggravated during this period. Therefore, the criteria for service connection are met.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to noise exposure during his military service, and the Board has granted service connection for both conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and an addendum opinion from a VA audiologist regarding whether the Veteran's current hearing loss disability arose in service or is otherwise related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has granted the Veteran's service connection claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that these conditions had their onset in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to insufficient reasoning provided regarding service connection for a bilateral foot disorder and an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus as there was no competent evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred in or aggravated by active military service, nor may they be presumed to have been so incurred.,The Veteran's prostate disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are service-connected, with reasonable doubt resolved in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's brain tumor was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service and is not etiologically related to service, including exposure to Agent Orange. His bilateral hearing loss originated during service, but his tinnitus did not originate during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, which are service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's claim for TDIU due to PTSD was granted, with a rating of 70 percent assigned. The effective date is not specified as the award has likely been implemented by the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's credible assertions of ringing in his ears during and after active service establish chronicity of the condition which was later diagnosed as tinnitus. Service connection is also granted for bilateral tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and a vocational rehabilitation specialist examination to assess his employability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disorder, diabetes mellitus, and increased rating for bilateral hearing loss were denied. The Board found no evidence of current disabilities or in-service incurrence.,There is no diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and the Veteran does not have a current disability that would warrant an increased rating for his bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and right little finger disability were found to not warrant a compensable rating under the applicable VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have not prevented him from securing or following substantially gainful employment for which his education and occupational experience would otherwise qualify him.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and respiratory disability, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his in-service noise exposure or radiation exposure. The VA examinations did not find a current diagnosis of either condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70 percent disabling, reflecting total occupational and social impairment due to symptoms such as gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; gross inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation or hometown.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case for scheduling a hearing and providing a statement of the case regarding the issue of service connection for diabetes mellitus, as due to herbicide exposure.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.