Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that service connection for bilateral hearing loss is granted, effective from the date of death (January 2012), based on evidence showing exposure to acoustic trauma during service and continuity of symptoms since service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability is due to in-service acoustic trauma, specifically from combat-related noise exposure during his service in Vietnam. As such, the claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his military service, with reasonable doubt resolved in favor of the Veteran. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's current diagnoses are related to in-service noise exposure. The residuals of ureterolithiasis have been rated at 60 percent based on constant urine leakage requiring absorbent materials changed more than four times per day.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is rated at 20 percent prior to March 18, 2016, and 30 percent from that date. The appeal for higher ratings is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is related to his service, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition. The claims for upper extremity cold injury residuals are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not currently have hearing loss as defined by VA regulations, and therefore service connection for hearing loss is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD, hearing loss, and tinnitus do not make him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to an unforeseeable transportation issue preventing the scheduled videoconference hearing. The case will be rescheduled for a new hearing.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's left ear hearing loss is found to have been aggravated by service, warranting service connection.,Service connection for right ear hearing loss and tinnitus are granted as the evidence shows these conditions had their onset in service.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (likely PTSD) is granted based on credible supporting evidence of a stressor that occurred during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are found to be related to service, while the remaining issues on appeal will be remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as there were no chronic symptoms of bilateral hearing loss during or within one year after service separation. The current bilateral hearing loss disability was not caused by his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's death was not service-connected due to the lack of continuous total disability rating for at least ten years prior to his death. The cause of death, rectal cancer, is not related to military service or exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss did not have onset in service, was not otherwise caused by or related to his active service, and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability is found to be related to his active duty service. The Board also finds that the Veteran has a diagnosed anxiety disorder and depressive disorder, both of which are less likely as not caused by or related to his conceded stressor of fear of hostile military or terrorist activity during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's service-connected conditions do not render him unable to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the previously denied claim of service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The Veteran's competent and credible lay statements, along with a private doctor's statement, support his allegation of in-service onset and continuity of symptoms since service. Therefore, service connection is granted for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has determined that further development is needed to ensure full and fair consideration of the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral hearing loss disability. The case is REMANDED for additional examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of an ear injury related to active duty service, and the Veteran's hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated at 10 percent under Diagnostic Code 6100.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to the need to locate service treatment records and obtain medical opinions regarding the appellant's right knee disability and bilateral hearing loss.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.