Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss did not manifest during service or within one year thereafter, and is not otherwise related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including scheduling a VA examination and notifying the Veteran of the scheduled examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be related to service, and he is granted service connection for this condition. The issue of bilateral hearing loss disability remains pending as the VA audiology evaluation has been ordered.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to the need to obtain post-service treatment records and military retiree records.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2016
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and hypertension. Specifically, an adequate etiological opinion must be obtained regarding both conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran seeks service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to address the separation examination findings and the relationship between the Veteran's reported hearing problem after exposure to military noise and his current bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's currently diagnosed bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to his active service, as there was no chronicity of symptoms during or within one year after service. The VA examiner opined that the current hearing loss and tinnitus were not etiologically related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's claim for restoration of service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been denied as the original grant was clearly and unmistakably erroneous.,The Veteran's claim for TDIU is denied as she does not meet the schedular criteria, and there is no evidence that her unemployability is due to non-service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability is due to in-service noise exposure and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's appeal was denied for the entire list of issues presented. The Board found no evidence to support service connection for any conditions, and the ratings assigned were deemed appropriate based on the current functional impairment.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and hypertension in June 1986. The Veteran's claim has been reopened, but the claims remain denied as new evidence does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, as well as his initial evaluations for post-operative knee conditions, have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability related to in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not related to his military service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including clarification from New Sound Hearing Aid Center regarding the use of the Maryland CNC test in their July 2013 audiometric testing and an addendum opinion from a VA examiner to explain any difference in results between previous examinations and the private examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to inadequate examination and consideration of his lay assertions regarding in-service ear infections. The case is now pending for further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied, but his claim for tinnitus is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus disabilities do not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, as they are considered one disability affecting the ear. The evidence does not show he is precluded from all types of employment due to these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable disability rating for left ear hearing loss was denied. The Board also remanded the TDIU claim, but did not grant it in this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed conditions did not manifest during service or within one year thereafter, and any current conditions are not otherwise etiologically related to such service. Therefore, service connection was denied.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.