Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss, at its worst, is productive of level I hearing acuity in the right ear and level II hearing acuity in the left ear. The criteria for entitlement to an initial compensable disability rating have not been met.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, and an acquired psychiatric disorder were denied. The claim for sleep apnea was not addressed as it is a separate issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a right ankle disability, PTSD, and chronic left ankle strain due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's hearing loss has been rated at 10 percent, the lowest available rating under VA guidelines. The Board found that his hearing loss does not warrant a higher rating based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to inadequate opinions in the July 2015 VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current tinnitus and hearing loss disabilities are related to his service, with the weight of evidence being at least in equipoise as to whether these conditions began during or were aggravated by service. As such, service connection is granted for bilateral tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is found to be related to his in-service noise exposure, and the Board grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's appeal for a compensable rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss was denied as he did not demonstrate compensable hearing loss at any point during the period on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to his service, as there is no evidence of these conditions during or within one year after service. The VA examiners opined that the disabilities were less likely due to in-service noise exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran is not rendered unable to obtain (secure) or maintain (follow) substantially gainful employment as a result of service-connected disabilities for any period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2016
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, and ischemic heart disease (IHD)/coronary artery disease (CAD) due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran's claim is being returned for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's hearing is manifested by no more than Level V hearing acuity in the right ear and no more than Level I hearing acuity in the left ear for the entire period on appeal, resulting in a noncompensable disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied. The issue of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of service connection for a right ankle disability is not addressed in the decision. The Veteran's PTSD rating remains at 50 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus do not prevent him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2016
The Board found that the Veteran does not have right ear hearing loss and did not find a link between his left ear hearing loss and service. Therefore, the claims for both conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Board has granted service connection for right ear hearing loss, finding that the evidence is at least in equipoise on whether it had its onset during service. The lumbar spine disorder with associated radiculopathy claim must be remanded due to a failure to issue a Statement of the Case (SOC).
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death. The issues on appeal were whether new and material evidence had been received to reopen a claim of residuals of head trauma, and the entitlement to service connection for various disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's three-vessel disease is presumed service-connected due to in-service herbicide agent exposure. The Board finds that the evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran had service in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, and therefore he is presumed exposed to herbicides. His current bilateral hearing loss may be related to his preexisting condition, but the examiner's opinion does not adequately address this issue. The Veteran's tinnitus is less likely than not caused by or a result of acoustic trauma in service. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is less likely than not caused by or a result of service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus arose in service and continued to the present, warranting service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2016
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss, effective from June 7, 1971, based on continuous post-service symptoms and in-service acoustic trauma.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.