Hearing loss Board decisions
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations to address the claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further evidentiary development and scheduling of a hearing. The Veteran's claims for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus are pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right ear hearing loss is related to his service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left knee osteoarthritis status post total knee arthroplasty is proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected right knee degenerative arthritis. The rating for the right knee disability remains at 30 percent prior to October 30, 2012, and a separate 10 percent rating has been granted for instability of the right knee since that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not meet VA criteria for hearing loss disability in either ear and his tinnitus is not causally related to active service. Therefore, service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus have been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The case is REMANDED for the following actions: (1) Adjudicate the issues of entitlement to an effective date prior to March 19, 2003, for the grant of entitlement to service connection for tinnitus and entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss; if the benefits sought cannot be granted, issue a statement of the case in accordance with applicable law and regulations. (2) Obtain VA treatment records from September 2014 to the present. (3) Schedule the Veteran for a VA examination to assess the nature and severity of his service connected residuals from a lumbar spine herniated disc with degenerative arthritis. The examiner should determine whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran has a neurologic disability impacting either of his lower extremities that is the result of his service connected back disability. (4) Then readjudicate the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed conditions, including whether they are related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not etiologically related to his active service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right ear hearing loss is as likely as not due to service, and therefore grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability was rated at 40 percent prior to March 11, 2013 based on the findings from the July 2011 VA audiological examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination regarding his bilateral hearing loss and potential service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2. The case will be returned to the Board after further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus have rendered him unemployable, meeting the criteria for a TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is service-connected and the Board finds that it is at least as likely as not related to in-service acoustic trauma. The other issues on appeal are either withdrawn or denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection are granted, with diabetes mellitus type II being presumed due to herbicide exposure and bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus established as a result of in-service acoustic trauma.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's current bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was not incurred in service and may not be presumed to have been incurred therein.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and tinnitus, are being reviewed to determine if they prevent him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has reopened the claim regarding the character of the Veteran's discharge and granted service connection for PTSD with depression. The decision also addressed the severance of right ear hearing loss and termination of nonservice-connected pension, finding it improper.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for service-connected bilateral hearing loss was denied. The Board also found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for reopening previously denied claims of service connection for a psychiatric disability other than PTSD, right upper extremity neuropathy, and TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's hearing loss is currently rated as noncompensable (0%) due to the presence of Level III hearing in both ears, which does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.