Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has found that the Veteran's diagnosed bilateral hearing loss disability is at least as likely as not related to his active service, thus granting service connection for this condition.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is related to noise trauma in service and grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection for bilateral hearing loss.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to outstanding VA treatment records and new evidence submitted at his hearing. The claims will be reconsidered after these records are obtained.
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss has not reached a level that warrants a compensable evaluation.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's pre-existing bilateral hearing loss was aggravated during service, and his tinnitus is related to his service-connected bilateral hearing loss. Therefore, both conditions are granted as service connected.
The Veteran's hemorrhoids are found to have had an onset during service and is granted service connection.,Service connection for tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, residuals of a left ankle injury, diabetes mellitus, type 2, and gastrointestinal disorder (chronic diarrhea) is denied.
The Veteran's claims for an increased rating and TDIU based on his hearing loss disability are moot due to the improper reduction of his rating, which must be restored. The appeal is granted.
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be related to his service-connected bilateral hearing loss, and the Board grants service connection for this condition.
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension as secondary to diabetes mellitus, but denied the claim for bilateral hearing loss.
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates, increased evaluations, and service connection were denied. The heart disability was granted an effective date of April 27, 2009, but the hearing loss and psychiatric disorder did not warrant compensable ratings. Service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction was also denied.
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining personnel records and a VA examination. The appellant's hearing loss and tinnitus are being evaluated in light of his service with the Army National Guard and Army Reserve.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his active service, including exposure to noise during service. As a result, both conditions have been granted service connection.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and effective dates have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of entitlement to an earlier effective date or higher disability ratings.
The Board found that the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of Peripheral Vestibular Dysfunction was not valid, and denied his claim. The Board also determined there was no clear and unmistakable error in the August 2000 rating decision denying bilateral hearing loss disability.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and opinion regarding his claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus. The examiner will be asked to consider whether current hearing loss and tinnitus are at least as likely as not related to in-service noise exposure.
The Veteran withdrew his claims for tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss disability, low back disability and PTSD prior to the Board's decision.
The Board found that the Veteran's current hearing loss disability was not chronic in service, continuous after service, manifested to a compensable degree within one year of service, and does not otherwise relate to service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.