Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer. The evidence did not show a current disability or establish a relationship between any of these conditions and service.
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain an addendum from the VA audiological examiner regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and whether it is related to service. The case will be returned for further development.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss has been rated at 40 percent, which is the maximum schedular rating available. The Board finds that a higher evaluation is not warranted.
The Board granted service connection for the Veteran's right index finger disability and assigned a 10 percent rating effective from August 23, 2004. The claim for higher ratings for bilateral hearing loss was also addressed but not resolved in this decision.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability of bilateral hearing loss for VA purposes, and thus service connection is denied.
The Board found that the Veteran's left ear hearing loss was not incurred during service or due to in-service noise exposure, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him in need of regular aid and attendance of another person, as he is able to function normally without the requirement for such assistance.
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA disability evaluation guidelines.
The Board found that the evidence received since the February 2005 rating decision does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, thus denying both new and material evidence claims.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left ear hearing loss disability was not incurred in service and may not be presumed to have been incurred therein. The right shoulder degenerative changes are currently evaluated at 20%.
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to schedule the appellant's requested travel board hearing. The appeal is now pending for further action.
The Board has determined that a new examination and medical opinion are necessary to determine the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss, as the current VA examiner did not consider all of the Veteran's history or complaints. The Veteran is also seeking service connection for tinnitus.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was initially rated as noncompensable prior to April 5, 2013 and subsequently increased to a 10 percent rating effective from April 5, 2013. The appeal is granted for the higher initial evaluation.
The Veteran's claims for a higher rating for tinnitus and an earlier effective date for the 10 percent rating were denied. The claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss was also denied.,There is no legal basis to grant any of the Veteran's claims as the maximum schedular rating has been assigned for all conditions.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are related to his in-service noise exposure.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that new evidence supports reopening of his left ear hearing loss claim. The Veteran is also found to have current diagnoses of bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus attributable to his military service.
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an updated VA examination and determine if the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his military service.
The case is being remanded for the VA to obtain Social Security Administration records and then review the claim again. The Veteran will be given an opportunity to respond.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's tinnitus began in service and has persisted, granting service connection for tinnitus. The decision on bilateral hearing loss is pending as it was not addressed in this specific decision.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied because he did not have a disability for VA purposes at the time of his separation from active service. The Board found that there is no evidence showing current bilateral hearing loss and thus, service connection could not be granted.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.