Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to provide proper notice and compliance with Kent v. Nicholson, and for additional development of the claims file.
The Board has determined that the reduction in the rating assigned for bilateral hearing loss from 20 to 10 percent effective May 1, 2012 was proper. The claim to restore the 20 percent evaluation is denied.
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for various disabilities, including bilateral hearing loss and low back disability. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records and adjudicate the issues.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss existed prior to service and was aggravated during service, warranting service connection.
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for bilateral hearing loss and maxillary sinusitis and vasomotor rhinitis, as well as his claim for TDIU, were denied by the RO in September 2009. The Board remanded these issues to allow for further development.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus are related to his active service.
The Veteran's right ear hearing loss meets the criteria for a service-connected disability.,Chronic back pain in service and post-service symptoms support service connection for low back degenerative joint disease.,There is no credible evidence of a traumatic brain injury related to service, nor any current diagnosis. Service connection is denied.,The Veteran's currently diagnosed sleep apnea is not related to service.
The Board has decided to remand the case for a VA examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss, as it is unclear if the current diagnosis is related to service.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his lumbar degenerative disc disease was granted, with a 10 percent evaluation. His claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are pending.
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be related to service, but his right ear hearing loss and left ear hearing loss are not found to be related to service.
The Board found that the Veteran's hearing acuity did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA regulations, thus denying his claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss.
The Board finds that the reduction of the rating for bilateral hearing loss from 20 percent to noncompensable effective July 27, 2010 was proper.
The Veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to service exposure.
The Board found that the evidence was sufficient for consideration of an extra-schedular rating, but this referral to the VA Chief Benefits Director or the Director of the VA Compensation and Pension Service did not occur. The Veteran's claim for a higher rating remains pending.
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable disability evaluation for residuals of prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction prior to March 1, 2010 was granted. Effective March 1, 2010, the Veteran is assigned a 40 percent disability rating.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining treatment records and a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability is related to his military service.
The Veteran's initial claim for service-connected hearing loss disability was granted, and he is currently rated at a 10 percent evaluation. The Board has not found any evidence to support an increase in the rating prior to March 19, 2013.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hearing loss disability causes significant occupational impairment beyond what is contemplated by the current 10% rating, warranting a higher 20% extraschedular evaluation.
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to his active service, as evidenced by a lack of in-service complaints or findings of hearing loss or tinnitus. The VA examiner opined that it was less likely than not that the Veteran's hearing loss or tinnitus were related to military noise exposure.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed before a final decision can be made on the Veteran's claims for service connection.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.