Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to service, as there was no evidence of a hearing disability for VA purposes on separation from service or within one year of separation. The Board also noted that the Veteran did not have sensorineural hearing loss caused by noise exposure in the early 1960s.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's preexisting bilateral hearing loss disability was permanently aggravated by noise exposure during a period of ACDUTRA, and thus service connection is granted.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have current disabilities of bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, or low back disability and there is no evidence linking these conditions to service. The claims are therefore denied.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hearing acuity does not warrant a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, as it is currently shown to be at Level I in both ears.
The Veteran's currently diagnosed bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to noise exposure in service, as there is no evidence of chronic symptoms or a current disability within one year of separation. The Board finds that the Veteran did not experience continuous symptoms of hearing loss or tinnitus after service separation.
The Board found no evidence of current bilateral hearing loss in accordance with VA standards, and thus denied the Veteran's claim for service connection.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unemployable and considering his claim of entitlement to an extraschedular rating for bilateral hearing loss under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a).
The Board found that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his service, thus granting service connection for both conditions.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that there was no evidence of a relationship between in-service noise exposure and current hearing loss. The Board also found credible the Veteran's testimony regarding his long history of tinnitus since service discharge.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disorder and an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss disability, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 40 percent.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability has been rated at a noncompensable level throughout the appeal period, as it does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under VA rating schedule.
The Board found that the Veteran's current leg complaints are not related to his in-service lower leg contusions and denied service connection for residuals of contusions of bilateral lower legs. The other claims were also denied as there was no evidence linking the claimed conditions to service.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral hearing loss disability, finding that there was no evidence linking his current hearing loss to his military service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his military service, with the onset likely occurring during active duty. As such, these conditions have been granted as service connected.
The Board has remanded the case due to procedural inconsistencies and the need for a new VA examination. The Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral hearing loss is pending.
The Board finds that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, as he is able to perform sedentary work with frequent position changes.
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus did not have their onset within a year of service separation or were otherwise related to his active duty service.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the initial evaluation for macular scar, right eye, with pterygium, bilateral eyes at a hearing. The case is dismissed as there are no pending claims.
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus were not incurred in or aggravated by military service, as there was no evidence of a current disability related to noise exposure during service. The claims are therefore denied.
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for the issues of an initial compensable rating for hiatal hernia and service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability, as well as entitlement to service connection for chest pain.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.