Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has determined that the evidence satisfactorily establishes that the Veteran's current tinnitus is related to active service and grants service connection for tinnitus.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that noise exposure during his military service likely contributed to these conditions.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss did not preexist his active service and was not aggravated beyond its natural progression during his period of active duty. Therefore, the claim for service connection is denied.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus is being remanded due to incomplete medical records. Additional efforts are required to obtain the necessary treatment records, including those from Ms. Jackie Battle and any other sources related to his military service.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for a skin disorder and bilateral hearing loss. The skin disorder claim was denied because no evidence related to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the issue (a nexus between his diagnosed skin disorders and his military service). The bilateral hearing loss claim was denied as there is no causal relationship established between the Veteran's current hearing loss and in-service acoustic trauma.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and providing notification as required by Kent v. Nicholson.
The Veteran's heart disorder, hearing loss, and tinnitus are presumed related to his service due to exposure to herbicides. Service connection is granted for these conditions.
The Veteran seeks service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The case is being remanded to obtain a supplemental VA audiological opinion that specifically addresses the Veteran's credible reports of excessive noise exposure in service and his experience with hearing problems since shortly after separation from service.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied as there is no evidence of in-service acoustic trauma and the current hearing loss did not manifest within a year of separation from service. The VA examiner found that the Veteran's hearing loss is more likely due to occupational noise exposure after military service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is causally related to his active duty service and grants entitlement to service connection.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current tinnitus is related to his inservice acoustic trauma, and thus service connection for tinnitus is granted. However, there is insufficient evidence to establish a direct link between the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and his military service.
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus as incurred in active service, and denied the remaining claims.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining private hearing test records from the summer of 1972 and providing a medical opinion regarding whether current bilateral hearing loss is related to service noise exposure.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including medical opinions and examination.
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability did not manifest in service or within one year of discharge, and is unrelated to service. The claim for service connection was denied.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current tinnitus is related to his military service, and thus grants service connection for tinnitus. Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded to obtain outstanding treatment records and a VA examination. The issue of entitlement to a TDIU has also been raised.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his failure to appear for a scheduled hearing. The case will be returned to the Board after scheduling a new hearing.
The Veteran's headache disorder is granted as incurred in service. The status of his right ear hearing loss and skin rash of the hands, forearms, and groin claims remains pending.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is rated as noncompensable under the VA rating schedule, and there are no exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extraschedular evaluation.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.