Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 indexed Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for migraines and remanded the case to obtain additional medical records, clarify the Veteran's disability picture, and schedule appropriate VA examinations.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an opinion from VA healthcare providers regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is related to his military service in Vietnam.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
The Veteran's claim for a compensable initial evaluation for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA audiological examination and clarification of private audiometric evaluations.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left ear hearing loss is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to unclear evidence of his employability by reason of service-connected disabilities. Additional development, including a medical examination and review of SSA records, is required.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to the need for clarification of the June 2009 VA examiner's opinion regarding the etiology of these conditions.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus based on the Veteran's credible statements of in-service stressors and noise exposure. The diagnoses are supported by VA medical records and expert opinions.
The VA determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is not related to his military service, despite his reported noise exposure. The Board found no medical evidence showing a threshold shift in hearing at separation from service and concluded that the Veteran's tinnitus was likely caused by service but his hearing loss was not.
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by service, as there was no evidence of in-service injury or disease. The VA examiner could not determine a nexus between current hearing loss and service due to the many years of occupational noise exposure.
The Board found that the preponderance of evidence is against finding service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, and malignant melanoma.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by active service, and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability. The claim will be reconsidered with new evidence considered.
The Veteran's claim to reopen his previously denied bilateral hearing loss was received on December 9, 2002. The Board granted an effective date of March 21, 2003 for the award of service connection for tinnitus.,An earlier effective date of December 9, 2002 is granted for the award of service connection for tinnitus.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a right ear hearing loss disability as defined by VA standards, and therefore service connection for this condition is denied.
The Board found that the Veteran's current hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to his military service, as there is no evidence of in-service noise exposure or a nexus between these conditions and his time in active duty. The preponderance of the evidence does not support the claims.
The Veteran is unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment as a result of his service-connected disabilities, which include PTSD, splenectomy residuals, low back disability, bilateral hearing loss, and kidney stones. The Board finds that the evidence supports the conclusion that the Veteran's service-connected conditions prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment.
The Board has determined that the appellant's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus require further development, including a VA examination to determine the nature, extent, onset, and etiology of any hearing loss and/or tinnitus found to be present.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including examinations and the provision of outstanding medical records.
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection were denied. The claim for service connection of bilateral hearing loss was not considered as it is not related to active military service.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.