Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The VA determined that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss was not incurred in service and denied his claim for service connection.
The Board has determined that a new VA audiological examination is needed to evaluate the veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, as the most recent VA examination was nearly three years ago and did not conform to required testing methods.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the submission of additional evidence that has not been considered by the RO. The case will be returned for further development and readjudication.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed conditions, including bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, broken nose, arthritis of the back and pelvis, and arthritis of the right big toe and foot, were not incurred or aggravated by active service. The preponderance of evidence does not support a finding in favor of any theory of service connection.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have current bilateral hearing loss disability for VA compensation purposes and therefore, service connection is denied.
The Board has denied service connection for bilateral varicose veins, left ear hearing loss, and right ear hearing loss. The case is being remanded to obtain a VA examination for the purpose of determining whether current right ear hearing loss disability is related to any incident in service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher ratings for his bilateral hearing loss, finding that the evidence did not warrant a compensable rating prior to June 16, 2005 and no rating in excess of 10 percent from that date forward.
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for left eye vision loss, bilateral hearing loss, and a disorder characterized as loss of equilibrium resulting from VA treatment in February 1984.
The Board found that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by his military service, as there was no evidence of current disabilities within one year post-service. The claims for these conditions are therefore denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's currently diagnosed bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by service, and therefore denied both claims.
The veteran's claims for right ear hearing loss and tinnitus were denied in July 1996, but he did not receive the denial letter at his address of record. He filed a new claim for increased rating for left ear hearing loss on January 31, 2003, which was interpreted as an attempt to reopen his right ear hearing loss and tinnitus claims.,The veteran's attempts to reopen his right ear hearing loss and tinnitus claims were denied in March 2004. He filed a new claim for tinnitus on August 31, 2005.
The Board has granted service connection for left ear hearing loss and tinnitus. Service connection for right shoulder impingement is denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss, finding that the evidence did not support a disability evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were denied as the current assigned ratings of 20% and 10%, respectively, are considered appropriate based on the audiometric test results.
The veteran's claim for a higher initial rating for his bilateral hearing loss was granted, but he is still not satisfied with the assigned 20 percent disability rating.
The veteran's bilateral hearing loss was rated at 10% prior to August 16, 2007 and increased to 30% from that date. The current rating is in accordance with the criteria for a 30% evaluation based on his audiometric results.
The VA determined that the veteran does not have a current hearing disability, and thus cannot grant service connection for bilateral hearing loss.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that new evidence does not establish a link to service.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a hearing disability for VA compensation purposes and his diagnosed tinnitus is not associated with his active military service.
The Board has remanded the case back to the RO for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and service medical records. The veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and bilateral knee arthritis will be reconsidered after this additional development.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.