Hearing loss Board decisions

The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of impaired hearing in either ear by VA standards, and there is no medical evidence linking his current bilateral hearing loss or tinnitus to service. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is denied.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher initial disability rating for eczema and service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The veteran's eczema was evaluated at 30 percent, which is the maximum available benefit. For his bilateral hearing loss, there was no evidence of a current disability meeting VA standards.

The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a compensable initial rating at any point during the period of time his claim was pending.

The Board found that the veteran does not have hearing loss or tinnitus that is related to his military service and denied both claims.

The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus cannot be granted as there is no evidence of in-service incurrence or a nexus to service.

The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by his military service, and thus denied both claims.

The Board has determined that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus did not manifest during service or are otherwise related to his military service, leading to a denial of these claims.

The Board found that the veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred in or aggravated by service, as there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military noise exposure. The preponderance of the evidence supported this conclusion.

The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a new audiometry evaluation as his hearing loss has reportedly worsened since his last examination.

The Board finds that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus are not related to his military service, as there is no evidence of in-service noise exposure or other causative factors. The preponderance of the evidence does not support a grant of service connection for these conditions.

The Board has determined that the veteran's left ear hearing loss is related to in-service acoustic trauma, while his right ear hearing loss and tinnitus did not manifest during service and are not related to a disease or injury in service.

The Board found no evidence of a hearing loss disability or tinnitus during service, and denied the veteran's claims for service connection.

The Board found that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are not related to his military service, as there was no evidence of hearing loss or tinnitus during service and no in-service acoustic trauma. The VA examiner concluded it was less likely than not that the veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus were due to noise exposure while in the military.

The Board has remanded the case for a VA audiology examination to determine if the veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are service-connected.

The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to determine the nature, extent and etiology of the veteran's tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss. The claims for service connection will be remanded for further adjudication.

The Board has determined that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are at least as likely as not due to his active duty service, including exposure to acoustic trauma. As such, service connection for these conditions is granted.

The Board found that the veteran's pre-existing hearing loss disability of the right ear did not undergo a permanent increase in severity during service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.

The Board has determined that the veteran's hearing acuity did not warrant a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss during the appeal period.

The Board found that the veteran's service-connected right ear and bilateral hearing loss did not warrant a compensable rating prior to November 12, 2003. The RO subsequently granted service connection for left ear hearing loss effective from November 12, 2003.

The veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, a skin disability of the feet (claimed as jungle rot), a bilateral shoulder disorder, a neck disorder, and a back disorder have all been denied. The evidence does not support these claims.