Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for an orthopedic examination. The veteran's claim for increased rating of his right shoulder disability and hearing loss will be reconsidered.
The veteran's service connection claims for peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, right ear hearing loss, and a skin lesion on the forehead are all denied. However, the veteran is granted service connection for a skin lesion on his forehead.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluation for his claimed conditions, finding that there was no evidence linking any of these conditions to his military service or herbicide exposure. The left ear hearing loss claim was not granted as compensable. Tinnitus was found not related to service. Thyroid cancer residuals were also not linked to service. Myasthenia gravis was likewise not found to be service-connected.
The Board has determined that the veteran's tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss were not incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a compensable evaluation.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for an eye disorder and bilateral hearing loss, finding no new and material evidence to reopen these previously denied claims.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have current diagnoses of bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, or a skin disability. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is denied.
The veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to noise exposure during service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and traumatic arthritis are not supported by the evidence of record. The claim for a bilateral foot condition is reopened, but service connection remains denied.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the veteran's current conditions are at least as likely as not related to his active duty military service.
The Board has determined that additional records are needed, including SSA records and medical examinations for the veteran's cold injuries and eye conditions. The case is being remanded to obtain these records and conduct necessary evaluations.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and VA treatment records. A VA examination will be conducted to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed disabilities.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining service personnel records and scheduling a VA examination. The veteran will also be provided with VCAA notice regarding disability ratings and effective dates.
The Board has determined that additional medical evidence is needed to decide the claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, as the current record does not contain sufficient medical evidence to establish a link between these conditions and the veteran's active duty service.
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining missing service medical records and arranging for a VA examination.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the veteran's claims for post-operative pilonidal cyst residuals, epidermatophytosis of the feet, hearing loss disability, sinusitis with allergic rhinitis, a psychophysiological nervous system reaction evidenced by hyperhidrosis, hives, and recurrent headaches, and an eye disorder to include open angle glaucoma. The RO has determined that new and material evidence was not presented for reopening claims for post-operative pilonidal cyst residuals and epidermatophytosis of the feet.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a compensable rating, and thus denied his claim for an initial compensable rating.
The Board denied the motion for revision of the June 2006 decision on grounds of clear and unmistakable error, concluding that there was no CUE in the decision.
The Board denied all service connection claims and increased rating claims, finding that the veteran did not meet the criteria for any of the conditions listed.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are related to his military service, and thus grants service connection for these conditions.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.