Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for left ear hearing loss was clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and thus the severance of this condition from the veteran's record is proper. The claim of service connection for right hand carpal tunnel syndrome remains pending.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding no evidence of in-service noise exposure or a continuity of symptoms since service.
The Board found that the veteran's hearing loss did not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent, as his audiometric results showed moderate to moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for a personal hearing before a member of the Board at the RO. The case will be returned to the Board after the hearing.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss, finding that the evidence does not support a compensable evaluation.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have current bilateral hearing loss, and therefore service connection for this condition is denied.
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, including bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, fracture of the right wrist with secondary neuropathy, residuals of a fractured left mandible and maxilla with temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and facial scars, do not meet the criteria for higher disability ratings. The combined rating is 80 percent.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the veteran's claims for service connection, including seeking additional service medical records and conducting VA examinations.
The veteran's service connection claims for bacterial infection with diarrhea, parasitic infection with diarrhea, and typhus infection with diarrhea were denied. The veteran was granted initial compensable ratings for DJD of the cervical spine C5/6 and C6/7 prior to May 20, 2004 (10%), and DJD of the lumbar spine (10%) since May 20, 2004. No other service connection claims were granted.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to new evidence and changes in procedural requirements. The veteran's claims for hearing loss, tinnitus, and left fibula fracture residuals will be reconsidered based on this new information.
The veteran is seeking higher ratings for his PTSD and gastroesophageal reflux disease. He also seeks service connection for bilateral leg nodules, a respiratory condition secondary to herbicide exposure, and sleep apnea.,The veteran is seeking an initial rating greater than 10 percent for his gastroesophageal reflux disease. He also seeks service connection for a respiratory condition secondary to chlorine gas exposure.,The veteran is seeking service connection for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. He also seeks service connection for bilateral leg nodules, a respiratory condition secondary to herbicide exposure, and sleep apnea.,The veteran is seeking service connection for bilateral leg nodules, a respiratory condition secondary to herbicide exposure, and sleep apnea. He also seeks service connection for coronary artery disease as secondary to PTSD.,The veteran is seeking an effective date earlier than April 9, 2005, for total disability due to individual unemployability (TDIU).,The veteran is seeking service connection for a respiratory condition secondary to herbicide exposure. He also seeks service connection for coronary artery disease as secondary to PTSD.,The veteran is seeking service connection for sleep apnea. He also seeks service connection for coronary artery disease as secondary to PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to issue a Statement of the Case (SOC) on the initial compensable evaluation for hearing loss. The veteran's claim for an increased rating for otitis media is denied.
The RO denied the reopening of the claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that new and material evidence had not been presented to establish a link between the condition and service.
The VA has determined that the veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a compensable initial rating, as his hearing acuity levels do not meet the criteria for any higher rating under applicable VA regulations.
The Board found that the appellant's current severe bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not incurred or aggravated by his period of active military service, including his ACDUTRA in 1963.
The veteran's claim for service connection for left ear hearing loss was granted. The initial rating for his left knee injury from March 25, 1997, to March 24, 2002, remains denied.,For the period of time from March 25, 1997, to March 24, 2002, the veteran's claim for an increased rating was not granted. The initial rating for his left knee injury and arthritis was granted at 30 percent effective April 11, 2002.,The veteran's claims for higher ratings on both his left knee injuries and right fingers were denied.
The veteran's claims for higher ratings for bilateral tinnitus, hearing loss, and PTSD are denied as the evidence does not support a schedular evaluation in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus or a compensable rating for hearing loss. The criteria for a 70 percent rating for PTSD prior to June 12, 2004, and an effective date earlier than June 12, 2004, are met.
The veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss and tinnitus were denied, while his claim for an increased evaluation of PTSD was granted at a 10% rating.
The Board found no evidence of a chronic skin rash in service and denied the claim. For other conditions, additional development is needed to determine if they are related to service.
The Board denied all claims for service connection and initial ratings, finding no evidence of a current disability related to service or new and material evidence.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.