Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The veteran's appeal is dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
The VA determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a higher evaluation, as it is currently rated as noncompensable.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining records from VA and non-VA providers, as well as seeking records from the Marine Corp Data Processing Center in DaNang, Vietnam. The veteran's claims will be reviewed again after all requested information is obtained.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not incurred as a result of noise exposure during active service and is therefore denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for right ear hearing loss and entitlement to an initial compensable rating for left ear hearing loss. The decision found that the veteran did not have a right ear hearing disability within the meaning of VA laws and regulations, and that his left ear hearing loss was rated as Level I.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability and granted entitlement to an initial increased evaluation of 70 percent for PTSD. The claims for bilateral hearing loss and TDIU were not addressed as they are pending.
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss resulted in a Level II hearing acuity, which does not warrant a compensable evaluation.
The Board denied service connection for left ear hearing loss, chronic headaches, and staggering and loss of balance as these conditions did not develop during or due to military service.
The veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss, post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the right knee, and right knee instability have all been granted with a 10% disability rating. The issue of tinnitus has been stayed due to court precedent.
The Board found that the veteran's hearing loss disability is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
The Board has granted a 30 percent rating for post-operative residuals of right knee injury with laxity, effective from the date of the decision. The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection have been addressed.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, as well as his claim for an increased rating for a shrapnel wound to the right calf due to failure to report for necessary examinations.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including lumbar spine disorder, cervical spine disorder, right wrist disorder, left knee disorder, left ankle disorder, headache disorder, and hearing loss. The decision is based on a lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension, eye condition, and bilateral hearing loss are not service-connected.,Specifically, the evidence does not support a finding of direct service connection for any of these conditions.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, but finds that these conditions were not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
The Board has determined that the RO's decision denying the veteran's application to reopen his claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, a shoulder disability, diplopia, and a stomach condition was not in accordance with the correct new and material evidence standard. The case is being remanded for further development.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of any current disabilities.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a rescheduled hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not warrant a compensable rating, as his audiometric results do not meet the criteria for any higher evaluation under VA's schedular guidelines.
The Board found that the April 1986 rating decision did not involve clear and unmistakable error in denying service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for tinnitus was granted, and his request to reopen the claim of service connection for hearing loss was also granted.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.