Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
139,098 vetted Board decisions for Hearing loss.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting a VA Social and Industrial Survey to determine if his service-connected disabilities render him unable to work.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete records and need for updated medical examinations.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss disability is due to noise exposure during his military service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
The veteran is seeking an initial compensable rating for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss. The case has been remanded to obtain updated VA outpatient records and a new audiology examination.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that these conditions originated during the veteran's active military service due to noise exposure. The Board also found that tinnitus is secondary to the veteran's bilateral hearing loss.
The Board denied an increased rating for hearing loss in the right ear, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a compensable disability rating.
The Board denied an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss, finding that the veteran's hearing loss did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under VA's Schedule for Rating Disabilities.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to conflicting medical evidence regarding whether the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss is related to his period of active duty service. Further development is needed, including a VA examination and consideration under 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(d).
The veteran is seeking service connection for a bilateral hearing loss disability, which he claims was incurred during his military service. The Board has ordered remand due to the need for additional medical examination and records.
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss, finding that his current level of disability does not warrant a higher evaluation.
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral hearing loss and otitis media with right mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty, finding that his conditions did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his previously denied claim. The RO also denied entitlement to service connection for tinnitus, concluding that there was no causal relationship between the condition and military service.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete medical records and the need for examinations to determine the nature and etiology of various conditions.
The Board has decided to remand the case for further medical evaluation and opinion regarding whether the veteran's current hearing loss is related to in-service noise exposure.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, finding that there is no evidence of a current disability or link to service.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hearing loss of the right ear, finding no current evidence of a disability as defined by VA standards.
The Board found no evidence of a nexus between the veteran's current bilateral hearing loss and his period of service, resulting in a denial of his claim for service connection.
The Board has ordered additional development due to the lack of service medical records, and the veteran's hearing was found normal at discharge. The VA audiology specialist will determine if his bilateral hearing loss is related to combat exposure in Vietnam.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of rheumatic fever and hearing loss, finding that there was no current medical diagnosis or evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and need for a VA audio examination. The veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are pending.
← Back to Hearing loss overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.