Hemorrhoids decisions — 2010
279 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2010
The Veteran's appeal for an initial compensable evaluation for internal hemorrhoids has been withdrawn. The issues of increased PTSD rating and TDIU are addressed in the REMAND portion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran does not have a current psychiatric disorder or hemorrhoids, and the Board finds that these conditions are not related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The VA has denied an increased evaluation for rectal prolapse and granted a separate initial evaluation of 20% for hemorrhoids. The current status of the conditions is persistent moderate rectal prolapse with mild leakage, and multiple recurrent thrombosed hemorrhoids with bleeding, perianal irritation, very deep furrows, and fissures.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2010
The Veteran's right hip spasm and hemorrhoids have been granted service connection, with the right hip spasm being granted effective from when it was incurred during her military service. The Veteran is also entitled to a higher initial evaluation for her hemorrhoids, which has been granted since September 1, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for hemorrhoids and left ear hearing loss, but granted a compensable rating of 10% for his service-connected left varicocele.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable rating for hemorrhoids prior to February 20, 2010 was denied. The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for hemorrhoids beginning February 20, 2010 was also denied.,The appeal of the effective date for service connection for rectal sphincter laxity is addressed in the remand portion of this decision.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2010
The Veteran was granted service connection for a pulmonary disorder (other than asthma), arthritis of the left ankle, and hypopigmented macules. Service connection was denied for hemorrhoids, post-traumatic syndrome/headaches, and mechanical back syndrome.,Service connection was granted for a pulmonary disorder (other than asthma) due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for various conditions, finding that none of these disorders were incurred or aggravated by active duty or active duty for training.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2010
The Board has granted service connection for a cervical spine disorder, a lumbar spine disorder, and hemorrhoids due to continuity of symptomatology since the Veteran's service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to errors in the March 2009 decision regarding the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and hemorrhoids.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2010
The Board has granted a 60 percent evaluation for the Veteran's service-connected asthma, effective from the date of this decision. The criteria for a higher 100 percent evaluation have not been met.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current rectum and anus disability, including hemorrhoids, prolapse of rectum, and impairment of sphincter control, is related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Board denied service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss, herpes type II, headaches, swelling in the joints, and hemorrhoids. The Veteran's claims were not supported by evidence of a current disability or a link to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran's low back and hemorrhoids disabilities were found to not warrant higher ratings, while his hearing loss disability was also found not to warrant a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral hearing loss, cervical spine disability, gastroenteritis with GERD, hemorrhoids, and left knee disability were denied. The Veteran is not entitled to a compensable rating for his bilateral hearing loss or a rating in excess of 20 percent for his cervical spine disability. He also does not meet the criteria for a higher rating for any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for degenerative joint disease of the lumbar spine, right knee, tendonitis of the right shoulder and wrist, hemorrhoids, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from March 1, 2008 were denied as his conditions did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2010
The Veteran's hemorrhoids were found to be more symptomatic than represented by a 'mild' or 'moderate' classification, warranting a 10% rating until March 2, 2006. After that date, the criteria for a compensable rating were not met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2010
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new and material evidence being presented, but no specific rating or effective date was assigned.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2010
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings and earlier effective dates are being considered. The Board has remanded the service connection issues to the RO, but is granting a 40 percent rating for his low back disability since March 31, 2010, and assigning separate ratings for fecal leakage as a complication of hemorrhoids.
← Back to Hemorrhoids overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.