Hip decisions — 2006
188 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, finding that there was no evidence of hearing loss or eye problems in service and insufficient medical opinion to support a link between current conditions and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, finding no current diagnosed sinusitis or evidence of a service-connected condition. The RO granted service connection in April 2001 but did not address the issues on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, finding that there was no evidence of current disabilities meeting the criteria for higher ratings or service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection for pes planus of the left foot, and left knee and hip disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development including obtaining medical records and providing VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD, bilateral wrist and hip disabilities, hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo with dizziness and nausea, and severe headaches. The evidence does not support a current diagnosis or finding of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to scheduling a personal hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to determine the current status of the veteran's claimed disabilities and their relationship to service. The veteran also needs to provide authorization for private medical records from his treatment at Fawcett Memorial Hospital in Port Charlotte, Florida.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's left hip disability was not incurred in or aggravated by service and is not secondary to his service-connected PTSD. The need for regular aid and attendance due to a service-connected condition is also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The veteran's right hip disability is rated at 70 percent, and he is granted a higher rating. The issue of SMC based on need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound remains pending as the claim was referred to the RO. DEA benefits under Chapter 35 are addressed in the REMAND portion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for right hip, knee, and ankle disabilities secondary to his left ankle disability. The claim for an increased rating for residuals of a left ankle fracture is being remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has ordered a remand for further development, including a VA examination and opinion to determine the nature and etiology of any current right hip condition. The veteran's service records show treatment for right hip conditions during his period of active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The Board has granted service connection for a back disability but denied service connection for a left hip disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims of service connection for a bilateral hip disability and hearing loss, including as due to medication. The evidence does not establish an in-service injury or disease that caused these conditions.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedNovember 2006
The veteran's appeal involves multiple foot and knee disabilities, as well as a headache disorder. The right hip disability is not found to be service-connected or related to other conditions. Ratings of 10% are assigned for the left foot bone spur with plantar fasciitis, right foot heel spur with plantar fasciitis, and residuals of a right knee injury with degenerative changes. A separate rating of 30% is granted for migraine headaches. The umbilical herniorrhaphy residuals receive a 10% rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development and notification under the VCAA, including a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his shell fragment wound residuals of the right thigh and limitation of adduction of the right hip, finding that the current disabilities did not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of a nexus between the veteran's current bilateral hip disability and his service or any service-connected condition, thus denying the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection for various knee and hip disabilities as secondary to his service-connected right ankle trauma are being remanded due to incomplete VCAA notice, inadequate medical evidence of record, and the need for further examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2006
The veteran's lumbar spine disorder and right hip disability are being remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to his service-connected gunshot wound residuals.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection and higher initial disability ratings were denied. The Board found no evidence of a current liver disease or other claimed conditions, and the veteran did not provide sufficient evidence to establish service connection.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.