Hip decisions — 2006
188 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a back disorder, hip disability, increased ratings for degenerative arthritis of the right and left knees, and laxity of the left knee. The decision also confirmed and continued the current noncompensable rating for pulmonary pleural plaquing.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for right knee and right hip disabilities have been denied as there is no new and material evidence submitted, and the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding of service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral hip disability is related to service and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has granted an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected right great toe disability, but denied service connection for back and left hip disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to issues related to service connection for left hip disability and degenerative joint disease of the lumbosacrum as secondary to service-connected residuals of a left fibula fracture.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral knee, hip, and low back disabilities. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service or any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a hip disability, residuals of cold injuries to the hands and lower extremities, and an increased rating for hepatitis B. The evidence does not support current diagnoses or show that these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection have been denied, and no new or material evidence was submitted to reopen the claim for a left ankle disability. The other claims were also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional medical examinations to determine the etiology of the veteran's current hearing loss and bilateral hip condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The veteran's service connection claim for a back disability and stress fractures of the tibia shaft was granted, with an initial rating of 40 percent for the back condition effective May 2, 2005. Service connection for left hip and femur conditions were also granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board finds that the veteran does not have residuals of a right hip replacement attributable to his military service. The claims for left hip and low back disabilities are pending as further examination is needed.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including back disability, left hip disability, left thumb disability, bilateral knee disability, multiple joint arthritis, residuals of multiple finger fractures, shingles, sleep apnea, hemorrhoids, and prostate disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a right hip disability, finding that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between his service-connected right foot and ankle disability and his current right hip disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a right hip disability, finding that there is no evidence supporting a nexus between his current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for residuals of a back injury, right shoulder disability, residuals of a head injury (including blurred vision and an arachnoid cyst), and hip disability. The case is now remanded for further VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection were denied across multiple issues, including heart condition, hypertension, skin condition, hearing loss, and disabilities related to exposure to herbicides. The appeal is not about service connection at all.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the veteran's previously denied service connection claim for bilateral leg and right hip disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current low back or left hip disability that is service-connected, and any disabilities found are not related to his service-connected left ankle or left knee disabilities. The veteran's TDIU claim is also denied as he does not meet the schedular criteria for a total rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current right hip disability or inguinal hernia related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has granted service connection for a right hip disability, but denied claims for left knee injury, left ankle disability, residuals of a right hand injury, and carpal tunnel syndrome in the hands. The veteran's current disabilities are not considered to be related to his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.