Multiple sclerosis decisions — 2009
90 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA examination to determine if the Veteran had manifestations of multiple sclerosis during military service and within the first seven years following his separation from service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's service-connected Multiple Sclerosis (MS) residuals, including right upper and lower extremity weakness, left upper extremity weakness with carpal tunnel syndrome, left and right otic neuritis, intermittent slurring of speech (stutter), and neurogenic bladder, are rated at a combined 70 percent. The Veteran's psychiatric symptoms are separately evaluated.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for multiple sclerosis is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's Multiple Sclerosis was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, nor may it be presumed to have been so incurred. The claim for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for Hepatitis B is addressed separately.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence had been received to reopen the claim of service connection for Multiple Sclerosis, which was previously denied in August 1997. The Veteran's current medical opinion supports a finding that his Multiple Sclerosis is related to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's PTSD is related to in-service stressors and has been granted service connection.,Multiple Sclerosis was diagnosed after the presumptive period, but its onset during service is supported by medical evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and providing a comprehensive examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for multiple sclerosis was denied in a January 2002 rating decision. The RO will reconsider the claim on the merits due to additional relevant service treatment records received from the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's diagnosed multiple sclerosis did not manifest within seven years of separation from active service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including a VA examination and an opportunity for the Veteran to submit lay statements demonstrating symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis within seven years of her separation from service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain clarification from the VA examiner regarding when a definite diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was first supported by medical evidence and whether it is at least as likely as not that identifiable symptoms were manifested during service or within seven years after discharge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 30 percent, and his claim for service connection of Multiple Sclerosis remains pending due to the need to locate relevant medical records from Kaiser Permanente.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for her service-connected Multiple Sclerosis was granted, with a combined evaluation of 70 percent. The specific manifestations were rated separately: 30 percent for Lhermitte's sign, 20 percent for sensory loss in the right upper extremity, and 10 percent each for sensory loss in the right lower extremity and fatigue/heat intolerance.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Board has found that the Veteran's multiple sclerosis is presumed to have incurred in service, and thus grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for multiple sclerosis due to new and material evidence. The condition is presumed to have been incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and evaluations to accurately rate her service-connected multiple sclerosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar degenerative disc disease and chondromalacia patella (right and left knees) are not shown to warrant evaluations in excess of 20 percent or 10 percent, respectively.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2009
The Board has granted service connection for Multiple Sclerosis and an increased rating of 20 percent for Right Knee Disability. The Veteran's MS is presumed to have been incurred in service, while his right knee disability warrants a higher rating based on the severity of symptoms.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Board found that the original grant of service connection for multiple sclerosis was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous, thus denying the request to sever the existing service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Board has remanded the case to clarify the period of service during which the VA examiner believed that the Veteran had symptoms of multiple sclerosis. The claims for service connection will be readjudicated based on all available evidence, including new private medical records.
← Back to Multiple sclerosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.