Multiple sclerosis decisions — 2011
96 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's Multiple Sclerosis is service-connected, as there is competent medical evidence showing it was present during active duty. The left shoulder disability is not considered service-connected due to its pre-existing nature and lack of aggravation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has remanded the case due to the Veteran's request for a Travel Board hearing. The claims for service connection remain pending and will be addressed after the hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and a VA examination to address the etiology of his Multiple Sclerosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for multiple sclerosis and an increased rating for his left knee disability due to additional development needed, including obtaining records from the Social Security Administration.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's demyelinating disease, including multiple sclerosis, was incurred or aggravated during a period of active duty for training from June to October 1993. As such, service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling the Veteran for a VA examination to determine the etiology of his claimed prostate cancer and throat disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's multiple sclerosis did not manifest during service or within seven years after discharge, and there is no evidence linking his current condition to military service. The claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case for a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge of the Board.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for her service-connected Multiple Sclerosis was granted, with a combined evaluation of 70 percent. The decision addressed multiple manifestations including depression and cognitive dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign, sensory loss in the right upper extremity, sensory loss in the right lower extremity prior to January 12, 2008, and fatigue and heat intolerance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims due to outstanding VA and private treatment records that need to be obtained, as well as a medical opinion regarding whether symptoms experienced during service or after separation were the initial manifestations of his diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's neurological symptoms are related to strokes rather than Multiple Sclerosis, and thus denied a higher rating for his service-connected Multiple Sclerosis. The claim for TDIU was also denied as his service-connected disability does not preclude him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2011
The Veteran's appeal for increased evaluations of his service-connected Multiple Sclerosis and depression continues, with separate evaluations assigned for each condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The VA has determined that a vitamin deficiency, claimed as secondary to multiple sclerosis, is not a separate disability for which service connection can be granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2011
The Veteran's service-connected Multiple Sclerosis has resulted in a loss of use of both lower extremities, warranting the maximum rate of special monthly compensation (SMC). Additionally, she is entitled to an additional allowance for need of regular aid and attendance due to her physical limitations.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2011
The Veteran's MS with right lower extremity weakness and foot drop was increased to a 40 percent rating effective March 13, 2009. Prior to that date, the condition warranted a 30 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed multiple sclerosis is not related to service, including as secondary to Agent Orange exposure. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2011
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for TDIU is denied. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a finding of permanent incapacity for self-support prior to the age of 18, as established by the medical records and social work assessment.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's multiple sclerosis is presumed to have been incurred in service due to symptoms observed within the 7 year presumptive period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for Multiple Sclerosis, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Psoriasis are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the onset of his conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2011
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for Multiple Sclerosis and finds that new evidence submitted by the Veteran supports a finding that multiple sclerosis was first manifested within the presumptive period. The claim of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking the current condition to active service.
← Back to Multiple sclerosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.