Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,543 vetted Board decisions in 2000.
The Board found that the July 1946 rating decision incorrectly assigned a noncompensable evaluation for duodenal ulcer, and now assigns a 10 percent evaluation.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as his service-connected postoperative residuals of fractures of the left radius and ulna with internal fixation, and postoperative residuals of a right bunionectomy do not meet the criteria for higher ratings under VA rating criteria.
The veteran's claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied because the loss of sexual sensation is not considered a residual of his hernia surgery.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased disability rating for his left index finger disability and for a total disability evaluation based on individual unemployability.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 50 percent for his service-connected depressive reaction, finding that the evidence did not support such an increase.
The Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's abscesses of Muscle Groups III and VI, left shoulder, and Muscle Group VI, right shoulder.
The Board found that the veteran's Reiter's syndrome was not present in service or for many years after service, and is not causally related to an incident of service or a service-connected disability. The condition was also not aggravated by a service-connected disability.
The Board found that the veteran's claimed residuals of head injury with associated memory loss were not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
The VA denied an increased rating for the veteran's Haglund's deformity of the right foot, currently rated at 10 percent.
The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence.
The Board denied service connection for impotency as secondary to the service-connected disability of status post intradermal squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, and upheld the current 10% rating for the penile condition.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his hallux limitus with degenerative changes of the left foot and postoperative metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint replacement, right great toe. The evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable VA rating schedule.
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension by reason of being housebound is denied because he does not meet the criteria for this benefit, despite having multiple disabilities.
The veteran's left knee disability was evaluated at 10 percent from August 18, 1995 to March 16, 1999 and denied for an evaluation in excess of this. From March 16, 1999, the claim is also denied.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, finding that there was no well-grounded evidence to support the claim.
The Board denied the veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA Section 306 pension benefits in the amount of $8,480 due to fault on the part of the veteran and lack of financial hardship.
The Board found that the veteran's chronic liver disorder, claimed as hemochromatosis, was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty service and denied his claim.
The Board denied service connection for Perthes' disease of the left hip and did not grant an increased rating for bilateral defective hearing prior to March 26, 1997. However, it granted a 40% evaluation for bilateral defective hearing from that date onwards.
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound was denied as he does not meet the criteria for either benefit.
The Board has dismissed the veteran's appeal as he did not file a timely substantive appeal for the assignment of ratings for toxoplasmosis.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.