Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran is seeking service connection for a right arm disorder. The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting an examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected choroiditis of the right eye is denied as there is no evidence to support a rating higher than the current 30 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a currently diagnosed left hand disorder and therefore service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that there is no competent medical evidence showing the appellant has spina bifida, and thus his claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1805 as a child of a Vietnam veteran born with spina bifida is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected Osgood Schlatter disease of the knees is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The case is being sent back to the RO for further verification of the appellant's military service and eligibility for VA benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and clarifying the veteran's hearing preferences.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has granted the veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of 38 U.S.C.A. Chapter 35 Dependents' Educational Assistance benefits in the amount of $485.57, plus accrued interest and penalty fees.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant is entitled to an effective date of June 26, 2000 for the award of DIC benefits.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew their appeal before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has granted a 10 percent evaluation for paresthesia of both breasts as a residual of bilateral mastectomy, effective February 27, 2001.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The appellant's service was classified as ACDUTRA (active duty for training) only, and he did not serve on active duty. Therefore, his enrollment in the VA healthcare system is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a currently diagnosed bilateral hip disorder and therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a splenectomy, finding that there was no evidence linking the procedure to his military service or any exposure to DDT.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's peptic ulcer disease and associated dyspepsia were not incurred in or aggravated by service, nor could they be presumed to have been incurred due to a period of active duty. The Board concluded that there was no evidence linking current symptoms to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The veteran's duodenal ulcer was granted an initial rating of 20 percent prior to May 6, 2005 and a subsequent increased rating to 40 percent after that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board finds that the veteran's right hand disorder, arthritis is not attributable to service and was not aggravated by service. As a result, his claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The veteran's appeal is dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and VA treatment records. The veteran's claims for a higher rating for his left knee disability and TDIU will be reconsidered after this additional evidence is obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence of verified stressors, and a new VA examination is required.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.