Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for VA death pension benefits, finding that new and material evidence was not presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's pre-existing Schmorl's nodes and Scheuermann's disease/juvenile kyphosis of the thoracic spine did not worsen during service, and thus denied his claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The veteran's skin condition, which affects more than 40 percent of the entire body and requires constant systemic therapy, has been granted a 60 percent evaluation.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The veteran's appeal for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of injury to the left index finger has been dismissed as he did not file a substantive appeal within the required time frame.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the loss of tooth #2 is not proximately due to or the result of the service-connected loss of tooth #3.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case for de novo adjudication due to deficient implementation of the VCAA. The veteran's claim is related to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has granted a 30 percent disability rating for post-operative residuals of right ACL repair, other than arthritis, effective October 14, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran's claim for service connection for sclerosing cholangitis, either on a direct basis or as secondary to herbicide exposure, is being remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA compensation benefits in the amount of $2,802.00 due to fault on his part and lack of undue hardship.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The veteran's service-connected genital herpes and chronic prostatitis have been granted compensable ratings as of September 30, 2002. The issue of a rating for multiple noncompensable disabilities is moot due to the grants.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The veteran's service-connected residuals, fracture, left condyle are productive of complaints of bilateral jaw pain and 'frequent popping out of place,' and an inter-incisal opening of 34 millimeters. The Board finds that an initial rating in excess of 10 percent under DC 9905 is not warranted.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran was primarily at fault in creating the overpayment of heightened aid and attendance benefits, and recovery is not against equity and good conscience.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence, resulting in a final denial.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for claustrophobia and a heart murmur, finding that there was no evidence of these conditions during active duty training (ACDUTRA) or at present.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for joint pains and gastrointestinal disorders, both claimed as due to radiation exposure. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to an issue regarding the appellant's income for receiving VA nonservice-connected death pension benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran is seeking service connection for various conditions related to congenital pectus excavatum. The Board has determined that further development, including a VA examination, is needed to determine if the veteran's current conditions are due to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran is seeking service connection for colon cancer and related surgeries, which he claims are due to asbestos exposure during his Navy service. The Board has determined that the required development of evidence regarding exposure before, during, or after service has not been accomplished.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant is eligible for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code. The eligibility period ends on August 13, 2009, which was provided to the appellant in June 1999 when her Certificate of Eligibility for DEA was issued.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have recognized service and therefore is not eligible for VA benefits.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.