Other conditions decisions — 2008
8,453 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The VA determined that the veteran's chronic respiratory disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found no evidence linking the current pelvic fracture disability to service, and denied the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied service connection for lupus and the residuals of an injury to the lower jaw and teeth, including for VA outpatient dental treatment. The evidence did not support a nexus between these conditions and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found that the veteran's stroke was not caused by VA care, and thus denied his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The veteran seeks service connection for mitochondrial myopathy, which he claims pre-existed his service and was aggravated by it. The Board has ordered a remand to determine the etiology of the condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the appellant's claim of entitlement to recognition as the surviving spouse of the veteran. However, the appellant is not entitled to recognition as the surviving spouse for purposes of receiving VA death benefits due to a lack of valid marriage.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found that the veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, skin disorder, fungus of the feet, and right eye cataract were not incurred as a result of service. The claims for these conditions have been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has ordered a VA examination to determine if the veteran's current lung condition is related to his military service. The case will be remanded for this purpose.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current disability of insomnia or fatigue, and any such symptoms are not related to service. The claim for service connection for both conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have active malaria and therefore is not entitled to an initial compensable evaluation for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the appellant's claim of entitlement to restoration of her DIC benefits, effective January 1, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to provide proper VCAA notice, and the appellant must receive new and material evidence notifications as per Hupp v. Nicholson and Kent v. Nicholson.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder or major depressive disorder, and there is no evidence linking these conditions to service. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found that the veteran's left shoulder disability did not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating, as his range of motion was within normal limits and he did not have ankylosis. The current 20% rating remains in effect.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's current posttussive syncope and chronic cough are not related to his active military service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a certification from the service department stating that her deceased husband had no service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army, including recognized guerrillas, in the service of the U.S. Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied because the injuries sustained in the November 1993 motor vehicle accident are already service-connected and therefore precluded by law.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's missing front teeth and tooth #19 extraction were not caused by in-service dental trauma, and thus service connection for compensation purposes is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete medical records and a need for a VA examination to determine if the veteran's current left femur disability is related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including providing proper VCAA notice and clarifying the appellant's representation.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.