Other conditions decisions — 2008
8,453 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development of evidence regarding the timeliness of the request for a waiver.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The appellant is not eligible for VA DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 or non-service connected death pension benefits because her marriage to the veteran does not meet the requirements of 38 C.F.R. § 3.54(c).
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's claim for service connection for neuroma of the third interspace of the right foot was denied as there is no evidence linking the condition to his in-service injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran is not eligible for nonservice-connected disability pension because his period of service does not include a period of war.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's claim for service connection for testicular atrophy was not established until December 23, 2005, and thus the earliest effective date is that date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the current severity of the veteran's service-connected ulcerative colitis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the service connection claim for dental trauma, claimed as missing teeth and painful dentures.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the Board of Veterans' Appeals for additional development, including obtaining new medical evidence and scheduling an additional VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The case is remanded for further development, including a new examination to determine if the veteran has post-polio syndrome and whether any current residuals are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability of the left eye due to a left eye injury incurred as a result of surgery and treatment on and after December 6, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded for further development and medical evaluation to determine the nature, extent, and etiology of any currently existing vascular disorder.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2008
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board found that the veteran did not have any additional disability of the back or hips as a result of VA hospitalization in June 1996.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board found that the veteran's spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 with spina bifida occulta and bilateral pes cavus were congenital defects that pre-existed his military service, and there was no evidence of additional disability due to aggravation during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the claim for Dependent's Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The veteran's claims for increased ratings were remanded to schedule a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2008
The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the June 1985 decision that denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's low back disability did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 20 percent prior to March 21, 2000, and did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 40 percent since that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's claims to reopen for service connection for arthritis of the back, an upper respiratory disorder, and a disability manifested by hemorrhage were denied as new and material evidence was not received.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2008
The veteran withdrew the appeal for an increased evaluation of his low back disability before a decision was made.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.