Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2016
The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal of the issue of entitlement to a TDIU, and as such, the Board dismisses this appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a rectal disorder, including condyloma acuminata and fecal incontinence is being remanded due to deficiencies in the VA compensation examination opinion. The examiner must provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's condition is related to his presumed exposure to herbicides during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the Veteran's claims of service connection for a stomach disorder and skin disorder. The case will be remanded to allow for further examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a currently diagnosed skin disorder and finds that his claimed skin rash is not related to service or herbicide exposure. As such, the claim for service connection for a skin rash is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination and consideration of updated treatment records. The TDIU claim is inextricably intertwined with the increased rating issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current visual disorder of the right eye is not related to his service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's mitral valve prolapse with tricuspid regurgitation was found to have a workload greater than 10 METs from August 28, 2015, to December 1, 2015, and greater than 7 METs but not greater than 10 METs from December 2, 2015, forward. The Veteran was found to have a workload of 17.1 METs during an August 2010 stress test, indicating he could perform more than the required workload for a compensable rating and in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination of the right rotator cuff repair with degenerative joint disease and obtaining any relevant treatment records. The case will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's CVA was not incurred in active service, may not be presumed to have been so incurred, and is not proximately due to, the result of, or aggravated by a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining relevant VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of her right fourth and fifth toe dorsal callosities. The TDIU claim will also be adjudicated in the first instance.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's trivial mitral tricuspid regurgitation is not manifested by a workload of greater than 7 METs but not greater than 10 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; continuous medication is not required. Therefore, the criteria for an initial compensable rating have not been met.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board denied service connection for residuals of cold injuries to the Veteran's bilateral upper and lower extremities as there is no current diagnosis of such conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Board has granted service connection for Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia and its residuals, finding that the Veteran's current disability is attributable to his military service. The claim for VA compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disability manifested by a recurrent abdominal hernia was denied as the development of a hernia was not found to be an unforeseeable event.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's foramen magnum meningioma was not found to be related to his presumed exposure to Agent Orange during service, and thus denied service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Board has granted service connection for right ear hearing loss, left knee disorder, and sinusitis with rhinitis. The initial compensable rating for residuals of left middle finger hyperextension remains unchanged.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of a vision disability etiologically related to service, including the Veteran's military service. The preponderance of the evidence does not support the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining deck logs of the U.S.S. Ranger from May 19, 1971 to June 17, 1971.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for his service-connected onychomycosis is being remanded due to the need for a more contemporaneous VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's rectal cancer residuals have been rated at 60 percent since September 30, 2013. The effective date for this rating is December 16, 2011.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's appeal for an initial rating greater than 10 percent for meningococcal meningitis and its residuals has been granted, with a final effective date of the date of service connection. The issue of entitlement to TDIU is also granted.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.