Other conditions decisions — 2024
16,189 indexed Board decisions in 2024.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2024
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under the MGIB-SR was denied because she did not have a six-year contract with the Selected Reserve, as determined by her service department. The Board found that VA cannot alter these findings and thus denied the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2024
The Board has determined that there are missing documents in the Veteran's case file, specifically her Rehabilitation Needs Inventory (RNI) and VA Form 28-1902b. The AOJ is instructed to obtain these records and provide a counseling record narrative report for proper appellate review.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2024
The Veteran's appeal for special home adaptation was dismissed because the issue became moot after he received specially adapted housing.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2024
The Veteran withdrew their appeals for service connection of oral cancer and a mandibular nerve disability. The appeal is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2024
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral foot conditions is remanded due to new and relevant evidence having been added, including medical records of superficial frostbite with tingling followed by numbness and pain in both feet. The claims are also remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his bilateral foot conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2024
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of cataplexy is granted. The Board finds a 40% rating for cataplexy from June 19, 2021, and dismisses the issue of reducing the rating to 10%.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2024
The Board has denied service connection for foot spasms, athlete's foot, and hammertoe due to a lack of objective medical evidence showing clinical diagnoses close in proximity to or during the pendency of the claims. The Veteran was not afforded a VA examination for his hammertoe, which is now remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2024
The Board found no current diagnosis of a left finger disorder, right finger disorder, or bilateral lower extremity nerve pain. The Veteran's STRs were silent for any such conditions during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2024
The Veteran's left ring finger disability has been productive of pain and limited motion, but the applicable rating criteria do not provide for a compensable rating.,There is no persuasive evidence to support a finding that the Veteran's deviated septum was incurred in or related to active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and DIC or pension benefits due to errors in verifying the Veteran's periods of active duty, active duty training, and inactive duty training. The AOJ is also directed to conduct development required by the PACT Act.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has remanded the cases for further evaluation due to insufficient medical opinions and failure to obtain a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2024
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral eye injuries with vitreous floaters, photophobia, and cataract surgery have not resulted in a compensable rating due to the absence of incapacitating episodes or other disabling symptoms.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error, specifically failing to obtain relevant private treatment records for the Veteran's metastatic cancer. The AOJ is instructed to request these records and take any further development steps deemed necessary.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has remanded the case due to deficiencies in obtaining private dental treatment records from Dr. Steve in Abita Springs, and for further adjudication.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of right parotidectomy for a new VA examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2024
The Board denied entitlement to a TDIU due to service-connected disability/ies, as the evidence of record is persuasively against finding that the Veteran was unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed conditions and their relationship to service, particularly exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2024
The Board granted the appeal as to the timeliness of the October 2017 VA Form 9 in response to the September 2014 SOC, resolving all doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2024
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for right eye disability (including amblyopia and monocular exotropia) due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand directives. The case must be returned to the RO for further development.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2024
The Board granted pension benefits in the amount of $188.38 per month from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, and denied them for the period from January 1, 2016, to April 1, 2016.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.