Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has granted revision of the May 1997 rating decision, assigning a noncompensable rating for residuals, surgical corrections bilateral hammertoes and residuals bunionectomy. A compensable rating (10%) for scar on the right great toe is now assigned from March 18, 1997.
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims of service connection for myopathy and proprioception impairment due to inadequate medical opinions. The cases will be returned to the RO for further examination by appropriate experts.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a left hand disability and a dental disability (previously characterized as a condition of the bottom teeth) for purposes of outpatient treatment only have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support granting these claims.
The Board dismissed the appeal for apportionment of the Veteran's VA benefits to his spouse, but the Court reversed and remanded the matter back to the Board due to issues regarding the validity of the overpayment debt created during the Veteran's incarceration.
The Board has granted a partial waiver of the overpayment for the period from August 2004 to December 2019, finding that recovery would be against equity and good conscience. The decision denied the full waiver request for the period from November 2003 to August 2004.
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding whether the contractual payment rate for home health services provided by the appellant from March 3, 2020, to March 27, 2020, was proper due to a specific administrative dispute resolution process that does not allow for appellate review.
The Board has found that both appeals were docketed in error and dismissed due to the same issue of entitlement to VR&E services under Chapter 31, Title 38 of the United States Code.
The appeal is dismissed because the Notice of Disagreement (NOD) was not properly completed and signed by an authorized representative.
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected gastric hyperacidity with recurrent reflux symptomatology and unfurled Nissen fundoplication is being remanded due to inconsistencies in the examination findings.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for pancreatic cancer has been dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Veteran's cause of death is granted due to the PACT Act, but other service connection issues are remanded for further review.
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings have been dismissed due to his withdrawal of the appeal.
Your appeal for service connection for severe toenail fungus has been dismissed due to procedural issues. No rating decision was issued on your claim, and no errors of fact or law were alleged.
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating of gout has been dismissed as the Veteran's attorney withdrew all appeals pending at the Board.
The Veteran's claim for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA compensation benefits, in the amount of $14,133.39, is being remanded due to disputes regarding both the validity of the debt and whether the Veteran should be held responsible for the creation of the overpayment.
The Veteran's appeals for higher ratings and TDIU have been dismissed due to their death.
The Veteran's adult daughter filed for accrued benefits more than one year after her mother's death, which is not within the time limit allowed by law. The claim was denied as it was submitted outside of the required one-year period following the date of her mother's death.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the issue of whether the contractual payment rate for home health services provided by the appellant is proper falls under a specific administrative dispute resolution process for Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs) administered by VA's Department of Veterans Affairs. This process does not allow for further review or appeal.
The Veteran's claim for past-due accrued benefits payment in the amount of $33,827 is granted due to concurrent receipt of retirement pay and disability compensation.
The Board has granted the appeal, finding that the appellant's character of discharge from service was upgraded to under honorable conditions prior to April 5, 1977. This upgrade sets aside any previous bar to VA benefits imposed due to dishonorable service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.