Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Veteran's appeal for a second use of a specially adapted housing grant was dismissed due to his death, as the purpose of such grants cannot be accomplished after the Veteran's passing.
The Board has determined that the overpayment of $8,719.00 in VA compensation benefits is valid and cannot be reduced due to the Veteran's remarriage.
The Board dismissed the appeal as there is no current case or controversy before the Board regarding payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided on January 5, 2021.
The Board dismissed the appeals for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical expenses provided to the Veteran by the appellant on February 12 and February 13, 2020, as the requested payment has been approved.
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is being remanded due to inadequate notice of the basis for the denial, and the need for supervision, protection or instruction must be evaluated under the correct statutory criteria.
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding a proposed reduction of survivor's pension benefits due to it being only a proposed action and not an adjudication subject to appeal.
The Board has determined that the notification provided to the Veteran and his caregiver regarding their eligibility for PCAFC benefits did not meet the requirements of 38U.S.C. §5104, as it lacked a summary of the evidence considered by the Secretary, applicable laws and regulations, identification of findings favorable to the claimant, or an explanation of how to obtain or access evidence used in making the decision, to include the assigned Tier level. The Board has therefore remanded this matter for proper notification.
The Board has determined that there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error in the AOJ's decision and remands the case for further action, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion.
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for TDIU should be remanded due to a duty to assist error. The AOJ is required to obtain SSA records related to the Veteran's disability benefits.
The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 30 percent for service-connected other specified trauma and stressor disorder is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The VA examiner did not adequately consider all symptomology associated with the Veteran's condition throughout the period on appeal.
The Veteran's right big toe joint replacement, with residuals, is rated at a 30 percent rating for the entire appeal period.
The Veteran was awarded SMC at the R-2 level for accrued benefits purposes due to his need for personal health-care services provided on a daily basis in his home by licensed professionals, and he required assistance with ADLs and IADLs.
The Board has decided that the original decision denying payment for medical expenses incurred on January 2, 2020 is not available and must be remanded to obtain it.
The Veteran's claim for a handicap shower under the Home Improvement and Structural Alteration (HISA) program is remanded due to missing documents from his application. The Board cannot consider these documents as they were not part of the original appeal.
The Veteran's former spouse, who had divorced him prior to his death in 2022, is denied recognition as the surviving spouse for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits due to not meeting the criteria of a 'surviving spouse' under VA regulations.
The Veteran withdrew his hearing requests for both temporary total evaluation and SMC claims, which were based on the same underlying issues. As a result, the Board dismissed these appeals.
The Veteran withdrew her appeals for the proposed reductions in ratings for left and right elbow epicondylitis, limiting flexion and pronation. The Board dismissed these appeals as a result.
The Board has raised the issue of entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) based on housebound, but insufficient medical evidence is currently available. The case is being remanded for a VA examination and a VA housebound opinion.
The Veteran is seeking payment for non-VA medical services provided on January 18, 2021. The claim was denied due to the time limit for filing the claim having expired. The Board finds that remand is warranted to ensure proper notice and compliance with applicable regulations.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions and incomplete evidence, requiring further development.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.