Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has determined that the claim is remanded due to missing procedural documents and a need for a medical opinion regarding the date of transfer from North Bay Hospital. The Veteran's condition was deemed emergent at the time of admission.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development of evidence regarding the etiology and nature of the Veteran's bilateral foot disorder.
The Board has remanded the case due to ambiguities in the Veteran's hearing testimony regarding his symptoms and the need for a new VA examination.
The Veteran's service-connected chronic adjustment disorder is granted a 70 percent rating, effective from September 21, 2010, through May 7, 2019. The appeal for an increased rating of the polysubstance abuse disorder was not addressed as it was not part of the original claim.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disability, including as secondary to his service-connected traumatic brain injury (TBI), is being remanded due to the inadequacy of an earlier opinion. The Board finds that establishing a baseline from 2022 in the September 2024 opinion was improper and fails to consider the entire period on appeal.
The Board denied an earlier effective date for DIC benefits, stating that the correct facts were known and no CUE was found. The Appellant argued his stepmother's error in filing a late application should have resulted in an earlier effective date.
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU prior to February 2, 2014 is being remanded due to the incorrect docketing under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) system. The issue has not been addressed in an SSOC.
The Veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation in excess of 60 percent for neurogenic bowel from November 8, 2022, has been dismissed due to the Veteran requesting withdrawal of their appeal.
The Veteran's death was caused by a service-connected condition, and the claim for survivors' pension benefits is dismissed as moot due to the grant of service connection.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for left hip arthritis and right hip arthritis, including a total hip arthroplasty. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions began during active service or are related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's eye disability, specifically dry eye syndrome. The AOJ is instructed to obtain a TERA examination and provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's eye disability is related to his military service, including exposure to toxins and environmental factors during his time in the Persian Gulf.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's costochondritis and service.
The Board has determined that the Appellant is not competent to handle the disbursement of VA funds and has remanded the case for further examination to assess her current competency.
The Veteran was granted additional dependency benefits for his daughter, but the RO did not provide an accounting of the amount of past-due benefits he was entitled to. The Board is remanding the case for a paid and due audit and issuance of an Appeal Notification Letter.
The Veteran's left foot condition is being remanded for an addendum opinion to address the nature and etiology of his condition, considering his lay assertions about its onset during service.
The appellants withdrew their appeal, and the Board dismissed the case as a result.
The appeal for an effective date prior to August 8, 2023 for the grant of special monthly compensation (SMC) has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran was granted entitlement to Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) from November 1, 2022, due to his service-connected heart and respiratory conditions. The effective date requested by the Veteran is considered.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for his stomach muscle injury is being remanded due to a duty-to-assist error in the previous rating decision.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for menometrorrhagia and hysterectomy have been denied, with the denial of both conditions being secondary to a service-connected condition (hypothyroidism).
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.