Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA Dependents Educational Assistance benefits was not properly created due to a sole administrative error, and therefore grants the appeal.
The Board has remanded both issues of entitlement to an initial compensable rating for chronic UTIs and entitlement to an effective date prior to April 23, 2014, for chronic UTIs due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand directives.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left leg instability is proximately caused or aggravated by his service-connected spondylolisthesis.
The Board has granted an initial rating of 10 percent for the Veteran's service-connected left fifth finger disability, finding that her symptoms include chronic pain and limited range of motion. The appeal is considered satisfied as a full grant of benefits was awarded.
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date prior to August 27, 2012 for adding his spouse as a dependent on his VA disability award. The decision is based on the laws and regulations regarding dependency benefits.
The Board has found that the April 2023 VA examination was inadequate for adjudication purposes because testing to confirm the Veteran's diagnosis was not performed. Therefore, another remand is necessary to obtain a new VA examination which performs all relevant tests and provides an opinion on the nature and etiology of any upper extremity nerve condition.
The Board has determined that the matter is not ripe for appellate review due to procedural issues and must be remanded to ensure compliance with contested claim procedures.
The Board found that the overpayment of VA compensation benefits during the Veteran's incarceration was valid and denied the appeal as to the validity of the debt.
The Board dismissed the claim for service connection for cerebral vascular disease as moot because it was granted in a previous rating decision, and there is no further relief available.
The Veteran's bilateral hydroceles did not cause any impairment in urination or renal function, so a compensable rating is denied.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for SMC at the R-1 rate based on need for regular aid and attendance is denied as his entitlement did not arise until March 28, 2012.
Your claim for service connection for CLL has been granted, effective from April 26, 2022. The appeal is dismissed as moot because the benefit sought on appeal has already been granted.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for accrued benefits as there was no evidence that the Veteran had any pending claims or entitlement to unpaid monetary benefits at the time of his death.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for left and right eye disabilities due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's right eye condition and underlying blood disorder. The case will be returned for further examination and opinion.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's severance pay was fully repaid, and thus there is no valid debt to recoup from his disability payments.
The Board has granted a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of Department of Veterans Affairs educational benefits in the amount of $6,860 due to financial hardship and other factors.
The Veteran's AML disorder and its side effects were active from February 27, 2003 to July 15, 2008, warranting an initial 100 percent rating.
The Board has decided that the propriety of the December 2017 grant of an apportionment to S.V. on her own behalf and on behalf of the Veteran's children, J.V. and J.V., needs further review by the RO.
The Board has determined that the remand is necessary to obtain a retrospective medical opinion for all heart conditions, including atrial fibrillation and premature ventricular contractions, to determine their relationship to service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.