Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Board has determined that the remand was not completed and requires further development to address the adequacy of the medical opinions provided, particularly regarding the Veteran's tremor disability and its relation to service and herbicide exposure.
The Board has denied service connection for a lung condition, finding that there is no medical evidence linking the current disability to active service. The Veteran's symptoms were not continuous or recurrent in service and have not been documented since separation from service.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for initial and increased ratings for seborrheic keratosis, finding that the condition did not meet criteria for a compensable or higher rating prior to September 18, 2024, and from September 18, 2024, as it affected less than 20% of his total body area with no systemic therapy required.
The Veteran's encephalopathy, resulting from VA treatment with Depakote in 2001, was found to be an additional disability not reasonably foreseeable. The Board granted compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
The Board has remanded the claim for a left elbow condition due to an inadequate VA examination. The Veteran needs another examination to determine if his current left elbow disability is related to service.
The Board has decided to remand several claims related to the Veteran's gouty arthritis of the knees, including increased ratings and SMC based on need for regular aid and attendance. The reasons include obtaining retrospective medical opinions, addressing deficiencies in previous examinations, and reviewing SSA records.
The veteran's claim for service connection for basal and squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratoses is granted with an effective date of June 8, 2011.
The Board denied service connection for the veteran's gynecological conditions, including changes to menstrual cycle, endometriosis, uterine polyps, and PCOS. The evidence did not show that these conditions began during active service or were related to an in-service injury or disease.
The case is remanded to determine if the overpayment of $13,396.48 was properly created and if a waiver should be granted.
The Board remanded the veteran's claim for service connection of immune system malfunction with food allergies due to inadequate medical opinion. The case will be reviewed again after additional development.
The appeal regarding the Veteran's Means Test eligibility category was dismissed because the Veteran died before a decision could be made.
The Board denied service connection for the veteran's right eye cataract, finding no causal relationship to in-service disease or injury. The VA examiner concluded it was less likely than not that the condition was caused by Agent Orange exposure.
The appeal for service connection for cause of death was dismissed because the appellant passed away during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a disability rating higher than 10% for spasms of the paraspinal muscles. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing incapacitating episodes or significant limitations in range of motion.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities preclude him from obtaining or maintaining gainful employment. Therefore, the Board granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
The appeal for educational assistance benefits at the 100 percent benefit level under the Post-9/11 GI Bill was dismissed because the benefits were already granted in full.
The Board remanded the claim for a higher rating of unspecified restrictive lung disease to correct an error in assisting the veteran. The veteran will undergo further testing.
The appeal for payment or reimbursement for non-VA treatment provided on December 8, 2019 was dismissed because the appellant withdrew the issue before a decision was made.
The appeals concerning payment for non-VA emergency medical services were dismissed because the costs were administratively approved during the appeal process.
The appeal for payment of non-VA medical services from June 9, 2019, through June 30, 2019, was dismissed because the claim was administratively approved during the pendency of the appeal.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.