Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The appeal for an allowance for an automobile or other conveyance, and adaptive equipment was dismissed because the veteran withdrew it.
The Board denied the claim for an earlier effective date for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance. The Veteran did not have a claim or evidence showing a need for regular aid and attendance prior to May 11, 2012.
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA treatment on January 28, 2020 was dismissed because the claim was already administratively approved and paid.
The Board remanded the case to obtain a new medical determination regarding eligibility for VA's Caregivers PCAFC program.
The appeal for Dependents' Educational Assistance was dismissed because the appellant requested to withdraw it.
The Board denied the surviving spouse's claim for financial assistance for specially adapted housing or special home adaptation grant because the veteran did not meet the criteria.
The veteran's earlier effective date for Total Disability Individual Unemployability (TDIU) has been granted, starting from August 14, 2007.
The Board remanded the claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) prior to June 7, 2016. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are being reviewed to determine if they precluded him from obtaining and maintaining substantial gainful employment.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for specially adapted housing and special home adaptation because the veteran did not meet the criteria for permanent and total disability.
The appeal for additional compensation based on recognizing H. as the Veteran's dependent spouse is dismissed because the VA already recognized H. as a dependent.
The Board remanded the case to reconsider an earlier effective date for DEA benefits. The Veteran's appeal is tied to his increased rating claim for a right knee disability.
The appeal for service connection of dizziness is remanded to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error. The Veteran will receive a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the dizziness.
The appeal for service connection of voiding dysfunction secondary to OSA is remanded. The Board needs more medical evidence.
The appeal was dismissed because the veteran passed away before a decision could be made. The surviving spouse may be eligible to continue the claim.
The appeal for service connection of a basilar tip aneurysm has been remanded. The Board needs more medical opinions to decide the case.
The appeal was dismissed because the veteran requested to withdraw it.
The Board granted the veteran's appeal to restore a 30 percent rating for scalp and facial actinic keratosis post fluorouracil treatment, effective September 27, 2022.
The veteran's appeal for attorney fees based on past-due benefits from an April 2023 rating decision was granted.
The Board remanded the case to review whether an overpayment of $1,565.76 is valid and if a waiver is warranted.
The Board dismissed the veteran's claim for reimbursement of non-VA medical treatment because it lacks jurisdiction over such claims.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.