Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The veteran withdrew the appeal for a waiver of indebtedness resulting from an overpayment of housing allowance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
The veteran withdrew the appeal for an increased rating higher than 70 percent for PTSD.
The appeal for service connection for hypo-osmotic swelling was withdrawn by the Veteran before a decision was made.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for reentrance into a VR&E program to correct pre-decisional errors, specifically ensuring that all relevant records are available and obtaining additional evidence regarding the impact of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities on his employability.
The Board denied the appellant's request for an increased apportionment amount of the Veteran's VA compensation benefits, finding that the evidence did not establish a need for an increase.
The appeal concerning the payment of non-VA medical services provided on December 21, 2019, has been resolved administratively and is now moot.
The appeal concerning the payment of non-VA medical services provided on May 25, 2020, has been dismissed as the issue was administratively resolved in favor of the appellant.
The Board remands the case for a new medical determination to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's passing during its pendency.
The Board denied the claim for accrued benefits as the Veteran did not have any pending claims at the time of his death, and the request for substitution was filed more than a year after his death.
The appeal is remanded to correct the AOJ's error in satisfying a regulatory or statutory duty regarding notice of the decision on the issue of entitlement to eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
The Board denied entitlement to Dependency and Indemity Compensation (DIC) benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for cause of the Veteran's death due to treatment by VA.
The apportionment of the Veteran's VA compensation benefits to N.B. was proper, as she demonstrated financial hardship and the Veteran did not reasonably discharge his duty to support her.
The appeal of the May 2023 letter was dismissed as it was not a decision to grant or deny benefits.
The appeal for benefits under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is dismissed due to the extension of eligibility for legacy PCAFC participants.
The appeal for eligibility to continue enrollment in the PCAFC is dismissed as moot due to an extension of eligibility for Legacy participants.
The Veteran's appeal contesting the award of agent fees to the Appellee based on past-due benefits awarded in a December 2021 rating decision is granted.
The appeal of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 30 percent for migraines has been withdrawn by the Veteran's authorized representative.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal before the hearing was scheduled, and the Board has no jurisdiction to review these issues.
The Board granted the Appellant's eligibility for direct payment of attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded in a November 2023 rating decision.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.