Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) found that the veteran's claimed mitral valve prolapse did not clearly and unmistakably preexist service, nor was it aggravated by military service. The Board concluded that MVP is a congenital disorder with no evidence of aggravation from service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected gastritis does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
The veteran's cystitis with irritable voiding syndrome is manifested by a need to wear absorbent materials that must be changed more than four times per day, warranting a 60 percent rating.
The veteran's appeal of service connection for a skin disability has been dismissed as the veteran withdrew his appeal.
The Board found that the veteran's current dental condition, to include infected and rotted upper teeth, was not caused or aggravated by his service-connected sinusitis. Therefore, the claim for service connection was denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right eye infection with resultant loss of vision, finding that his current optical disability was not incurred in or aggravated by wartime service and could not be presumed to have been incurred during such service.
The Board denied a disability evaluation in excess of 40 percent for residuals of a pilonidal sinus excision, finding that the evidence did not support such an increase.
The VA has determined that the veteran's benign essential tremors do not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation, as there is no evidence of incomplete paralysis of the hands. The condition remains noncompensable under the current rating criteria.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disorder, including lung carcinoma, due to toxic chemical exposure in service. The case is remanded for further development.
The Board granted a partial waiver of the overpayment, allowing $1510.00 and denying $2192.00 due to the veteran's failure to report her income changes in a timely manner.
The Board has determined that the veteran's peripheral vascular disease was not incurred during active duty and denied his claim for service connection.
The Board has granted a 20 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected left (minor) navicular bone fracture residuals, effective from the date of the decision.
The Board found that the veteran was guilty of bad faith in creating an overpayment of improved disability pension benefits, and therefore denied waiver of recovery.
The Board has determined that the veteran's impotence and urinary dysfunction are not service-connected, as there is no medical evidence showing a causal link to VA treatment in November 1994. The claim for an increased rating for hemorrhoids was also denied.
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed because he died during the pendency of his appeal.
The Board found that the veteran's genital warts were incurred in service and granted service connection. However, it determined that the criteria for a disability rating in excess of 60 percent for his prostate gland condition have not been met.
The Board denied an initial compensable rating for residuals of shrapnel wounds to the face, finding that the scars were not disfiguring and did not cause any limitation of function.
The Board found that the veteran's paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is manifested by symptoms compatible with ongoing intermittent short periods of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without undo dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, dizziness, or syncope. The schedular criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent have not been met.
The Board denied service connection for the residuals of pneumonia but granted service connection for obstructive pulmonary disease, which is not a residual of the claimed pneumonia.
The Board has determined that the veteran's prostatitis with urethral stricture warrants a 40 percent evaluation, which is higher than the current 20 percent rating. The evidence shows that the veteran changed his absorbent pads twice a day, meeting the criteria for a 40 percent evaluation.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.