Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examinations and a need for further medical opinions regarding the Veteran's lung disability, including asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The Veteran's unspecified trauma-related disorder is rated at 30 percent, the lowest available rating under the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders. The disability picture does not warrant a higher rating as there are no symptoms of flattened affect, circulatory or gastrointestinal symptoms, or other criteria that would support a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has decided that the Veteran is entitled to a TDIU, but found an error in not obtaining relevant Social Security Administration records prior to denying the claim. The case is being sent back for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2021
The Board has determined that the Veteran's currently diagnosed ulcerative colitis had its onset during his military service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2021
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to their death, and the case is not eligible for substitution as no living person would be eligible for accrued benefits.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2021
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death, and the case is not about service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The Veteran's death occurred in January 2019, and he was not entitled to any benefits due and unpaid at the time of his death because an award of pension would have been terminated prior to the date on which such award would have been payable. The Board denied the claim for payment of special monthly pension based on the need for aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2021
The Board has determined that the Veteran's stroke residuals are related to his period of active service, and thus grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient notice provided by the AOJ and lack of jurisdictional authority.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient notice provided by the AOJ and lack of jurisdictional authority.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2021
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for attorney fees, and the Board has dismissed it.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2021
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance, resulting in the dismissal of this case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to unclear records regarding whether the Veteran's nonservice-connected pension benefits were terminated effective December 1, 2014 and if so, the basis of the termination. Additionally, a thorough calculation of any overpayment and current remaining balance must be completed.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The Board denied service connection for an embolism and microscopic hematuria, finding that the evidence did not support a link to the Veteran's military service or any presumptive exposure. The Board also found no qualifying chronic disability warranting presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and issuing a new medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's dysrhythmia is related to service or caused by his service-connected psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2021
The Board has determined that the Appellant's discharge for the period from January 1992 to February 1995 is honorable, thus not a bar to VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The Veteran's service was not during a period of war, and his discharge was under dishonorable conditions. Therefore, the veteran does not meet the eligibility requirements for survivor pension benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2021
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a DRO hearing and an audit of the Veteran's VA benefits. The overpayment claim will be reconsidered based on these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The appellant cannot be recognized as the surviving child of the Veteran for VA benefits purposes, and therefore his claim for death pension benefits is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2021
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a removal of his right testicle, finding that it was a congenital defect pre-existing in service and not aggravated by military service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.