Other conditions Board decisions

The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that his cardiac arrest and other conditions were not related to his military service.

The Board has granted service connection for myelodysplastic syndrome and aplastic anemia, finding that the Veteran's current diagnoses are related to her exposure to herbicides during service.

The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a brain tumor and its residuals, including as due to exposure to herbicide agents, and for vision loss, including as secondary to a brain tumor. The remand is necessary because of inadequate rationale in previous medical opinions.

Your appeal has been dismissed because you requested to withdraw it.

The Veteran's claim for service connection for throat cancer is dismissed due to his death before a decision was made.

The Board found that the appellant's character of discharge was under other than honorable conditions due to a conviction for attempted murder and illegal transportation of a firearm across state lines. As such, his benefits are barred.

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the Veteran's bilateral upper extremity condition, including whether it is related to service-connected diabetes mellitus or active duty in Southwest Asia. The case will be returned for further examination and opinion.

The Board has reopened the claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits due to new and material evidence. However, the Appellant is not eligible for VA benefits as he does not have recognized active military service.

The Board denied service connection for avascular necrosis of the left hip, finding that it is not secondary to any service-connected disability. The issues of entitlement to special monthly compensation and specially adapted housing are remanded.

The Veteran's right great toe disability is granted a 20 percent rating from June 4, 2013. Other claims are denied.

The Board has determined that an additional remand is necessary to satisfy VA's duty to assist and obtain the May 2011 Goldmann charts, as well as to provide a new addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's bilateral ocular myasthenia and diplopia.

The Board denied service connection for ulcerative colitis and myocardial infarction, finding that the evidence did not support a link to service or any qualifying chronic disability.

The Board has denied a rating in excess of 20 percent for CRPS prior to October 7, 2019 and remanded the issue of entitlement to a rating in excess of 40 percent since that date. The case is now being returned to the AOJ for further consideration.

The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's claimed dizziness. The matter is now being returned for further examination and a new opinion.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), finding that there was no evidence of BPH in service and noting a significant time gap between exposure to Camp Lejeune water contamination and the diagnosis of BPH.

The Board has remanded the case due to the Veteran's failure to respond to requests for additional evidence and an extension of time is requested. The Veteran must submit a VA Form 21-8940 as well as any other necessary documentation.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits as of June 1, 2017 due to excessive income.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for an apportionment of his VA compensation benefits, finding that he is reasonably providing support for his children and that granting such an apportionment would cause undue hardship to him.

The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and burial benefits due to additional development being needed. The claim for service connection is pending, while the appeal for burial benefits was not fully adjudicated.

The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death, and no jurisdiction remains for the Board to adjudicate the merits of the case.