Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran does not have a current disability of either hand or shoulder. The Board finds that the Veteran's complaints regarding these symptoms are not credible given the consistently normal findings on repeated examinations and lack of any notations of swelling in the VA examination reports.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating and TDIU due to residuals of a fracture of the right tibia and fibula was denied by the Board. The case is being remanded for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for a VA orthopedic examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a skin disorder on his hands and a left leg disorder, finding that there was no evidence of such conditions in service or within one year after discharge. The VA examiner concluded that the current skin condition is not related to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's service-connected status post septoplasty with history of nasal fracture has not resulted in a compensable disability rating since April 25, 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's asthma did not contribute to his cause of death, which was hepatic encephalopathy and end stage liver disease. The VA medical opinions were considered more probative than those from Drs. Wright and Bash.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a videoconference hearing before the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of nephrectomy are currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted based on the current evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA death pension benefits as she was not legally married to the Veteran for a period of one year prior to his death, and therefore did not meet the legal requirements for surviving spouse status.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and higher initial ratings for his service-connected left elbow and wrist disabilities, as well as his claim for a stomach/gastrointestinal disorder claimed as secondary to service-connected orthopedic disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Board found that the overpayment of $820.80 was due to VA's administrative error in continuing to issue educational benefits after the appellant withdrew from her courses, and thus granted a waiver of recovery.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2010
The Veteran's appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) has been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran is seeking service connection for additional eye disabilities, including cataracts and macular drusen, which he believes are related to his service-connected bilateral pterygium. The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an opinion on the relationship between the service-connected condition and the claimed additional disorders.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Veteran's claim for special monthly pension at the housebound rate is granted, provided that he meets the service requirements and has a disability evaluation in excess of 60 percent. The Veteran also claims need for regular aid and attendance, which will be addressed by scheduling him for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected prostatic cancer contributed substantially or materially to his death from malignant glioblastoma, and thus grants service connection for cause of death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and a need for further examination, but no specific service connection is granted or denied at this time.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's cause of death, nephritis, is not service-connected and thus denied the claim for service connection. The appellant also sought nonservice-connected death pension benefits based on her spouse's Philippine military service, which was found to be ineligible due to a lack of active duty service. Finally, the appellant's claim for accrued benefits was denied as she did not file within one year after her husband's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's active duty service was less than 24 months, and he did not meet the six years of honorable service in the Army National Guard required for home loan benefits. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development due to new evidence submitted by the appellant. The claim will be readjudicated, and a supplemental statement of the case will be issued.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the overpayment of $7,755.60 was validly created due to a fraud scheme perpetuated by sixty Veterans enrolled at Ramon Magsaysay Technological University (RMTU), including the Veteran who is the subject of this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's cause of death, cardio-respiratory failure and cerebrovascular accident-hemorrhage, were not caused by any incident of service. The claim for service connection was denied as there is no medical evidence showing a link between these conditions and his military service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.