Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred on July 16, 2008 at Chadron Community Hospital were not covered by VA as the treatment was not authorized in advance and did not meet the criteria for reimbursement under applicable regulations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain VA examinations for the Veteran's left ear disability and right hand laceration, as well as to determine if there is good cause for his failure to report to scheduled VA examinations. The case will be reconsidered based on the new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's service medical records did not contain any objective findings of tongue thrusting, and there is no current diagnosis of a tongue thrusting disability. Therefore, the claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his hearing loss claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral foot disorders, finding that the evidence did not support a grant of service connection based on direct service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's right eye blindness and retinal detachment were not caused by VA surgical treatment, and thus denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2010
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and no jurisdiction remains for the merits of this claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Veteran's need for regular aid and attendance due to her heart attacks, strokes, and other medical conditions has been established. She is granted special monthly pension based on the need for aid and attendance of another person.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance of another person is being remanded due to conflicting findings in his examination report.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's polycystic ovarian disease and gallbladder removal are not related to service or any in-service events, including surgery. The preponderance of evidence is against these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a nervous disorder and a stomach disorder are being remanded due to the need for clarification of whether these disabilities are related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for issuance of a SOC addressing his entitlement to an effective date prior to December 29, 2004, for the award of a permanent and total disability rating for pension purposes. Additionally, he is scheduled for hearings before a VA hearing officer and a Veterans Law Judge sitting at the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the effective date for the award of additional compensation for the Veteran's spouse should be September 1, 2005, as evidence of dependency was received within a year of notification of the July 1998 rating action.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2010
The Board has granted service connection for Hodgkin's disease on a presumptive basis due to exposure to herbicides in Thailand. Secondary service connection for basal cell carcinomas and Merkel cancer is also granted as they are related to the Veteran's service-connected Hodgkin's disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Veteran's service connection for dental trauma to tooth number 9 is granted, as the evidence shows that he incurred trauma in service and received treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to insufficient information regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's current bilateral leg disability and metabolic syndrome.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran is seeking payment or reimbursement for private medical expenses incurred from May 19, 2006 to May 22, 2006 at the Regional Hospital of Jackson. The case has been remanded due to lack of VCAA notice and potential retroactive application of the Veterans' Emergency Care Fairness Act of 2009.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a new VA examination to assess the frequency and severity of his service-connected narcolepsy. Additionally, the claim for TDIU will be addressed.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for reinstatement of DIC benefits as she remarried at age 47, which is not eligible under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's service-connected gastrointestinal disorder does not prevent him from securing and obtaining substantially gainful employment.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.