Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's post traumatic stress disorder was rated at 70 percent disabling from September 29, 1999 to March 4, 2002.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to an inadequate VA examination in May 2007.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate examination and VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inconsistencies in a previous VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at a private facility was denied as there is no documentation of the services provided or the costs incurred.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied an initial compensable rating for the service-connected left 4th finger on a schedular basis, but remanded the case for consideration of an extraschedular rating. The case is now before the Board again to consider this issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's head injury is not related to his service, and denied his claim for service connection.,The Veteran failed to report for scheduled VA examinations for his leg and back conditions. As a result, these claims were denied due to failure to report.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for disabilities of the tongue, vocal cords and swallowing complaints is being remanded due to incomplete examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the veteran's right hip disorder is not related to his military service or a service-connected condition, and therefore denied his claim for service connection. For his residuals of a right second toe stress fracture, he was granted evaluations up to 20 percent prior to July 31, 2008, but no higher evaluation is warranted after that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have qualifying service in the United States Armed Forces, and therefore is not eligible for VA disability benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's duodenal ulcer was rated at 40 percent prior to April 2006 and increased to 40 percent from April 2006 onwards. The Board found no evidence of severe symptoms or other criteria warranting a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found no current evidence of a duodenal ulcer or its residuals, and thus denied the Veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of development regarding exposure to ionizing radiation, which may be related to the Veteran's cause of death from metastatic liver cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found no evidence of a chronic left or right leg disability separate and distinct from the Veteran's service-connected bilateral flat feet. The Veteran's current leg conditions are not considered to be proximately due to, or aggravated by, his service-connected bilateral flat feet.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board determined that the appellant's character of discharge was under dishonorable conditions, which barred him from receiving VA non-service-connected pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2009
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to the submission of a request to withdraw his appeals regarding whether new and material evidence had been received to reopen a claim for service connection for residuals of an injury to the back, and entitlement to a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to a scheduling issue for a Travel Board Hearing at the RO in Atlanta, Georgia.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's thrombophlebitis is related to his service and grants this claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's cancer of the tongue and tonsil did not begin during service or be related to herbicide exposure, thus denying his claim for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.