Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a videoconference hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for residuals of a gunshot wound to the right chest was granted, with a 10 percent rating effective May 21, 2007. Prior to this date, he received a separate compensable rating for the scar.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's gastrointestinal disability is not related to service and therefore denied her claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Board granted service connection for schizoaffective disorder, depressive type and entitlement to Dependents' Education Assistance with an effective date of December 17, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including providing VCAA notice and obtaining a VA examination to assess the etiology of the Veteran's loss of bladder control and the current severity of his service-connected lumbosacral strain.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Veteran's case is being remanded due to the need for additional review of evidence and preparation of a Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC). The benefits sought remain denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left knee disability. The evidence did not support a higher rating as there was no objective evidence of subluxation or instability, episodes of locking or effusion, weakness, nonunion of the tibia and fibula with loose motion requiring a brace, or arthritis.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found that the appellant's discharge from service was under dishonorable conditions, thus constituting a bar to VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The claim for left foot toenail disease was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's daughter is not eligible for Chapter 35 educational assistance benefits because she reached her 26th birthday before the effective date of a permanent and total disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's pulmonary disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service, including as a result of exposure to asbestos.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2009
The appellant has withdrawn her appeal regarding the cause of the Veteran's death, thus the Board does not have jurisdiction to consider this matter.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the claim for service connection for liver cancer and determined that it did not cause or contribute substantially to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's left knee disability has not been manifested by ankylosis, severe subluxation or lateral instability, dislocated semilunar cartilage with frequent episodes of locking, pain, and effusion, symptomatic removal of semilunar cartilage, genu recurvatum, a compensable degree of limitation of motion, or impairment of the tibia and fibula. Therefore, the Veteran is not entitled to a rating in excess of 20 percent for chondromalacia of the left patella.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for a skin disorder, finding that his current vitiligo is not related to any condition treated in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete documentation and a need for additional medical opinion. The Veteran seeks service connection for a skin disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The VA determined that the Veteran's lung disability, including as secondary to exposure to silica dust, is not service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current symptoms are not related to his in-service episode of heat exhaustion, and therefore denied service connection for residuals of heat exhaustion.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran does not currently have a diagnosis of vaginitis, cervicitis, or endocervicitis and there is no evidence of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertensive retinopathy, finding that there was no current diagnosis of this condition and thus not meeting the criteria for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.