Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The reduction of the Veteran's compensation benefits due to his incarceration for a felony, effective June 1, 2004, was proper.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The case is remanded for proper notification and issuance of a statement of the case to the Veteran in response to his notice of disagreement.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to verify the Veteran's possible exposure to herbicides during service in Thailand.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The case is remanded for additional development, including an examination to determine the current nature and extent of the Veteran's low back disability.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2009
The Veteran's dementia due to head trauma with deficits in memory, abstract thinking, and verbal fluency, and mood disorder has been rated at 100 percent for the entire appeal period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to obtain additional evidence, including service treatment records and any relevant medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The Board remands the appeal for a VA examination to determine whether there is any current disability as a residual of an in-service shell fragment wound.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran has lost use of his lower extremities due to organic conditions or functional loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's onychomycosis of the toes did not meet the criteria for an initial compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claims for specially adapted housing and special home adaptation were denied as the evidence did not support that he met the criteria for either benefit.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of a TDIU is dismissed as a matter of law.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2009
The claimant is entitled to payment or reimbursement for an additional 12 college credits earned while enrolled at the University of Utah from August 2005 to December 2005 and from January 2006 to May 2006 as Dependents Educational Assistance benefits, pursuant to Chapter 35 of Title 38, United States Code.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of basic eligibility to Chapter 35 educational benefits was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Saint Francis Hospital from January 9, 2006 to January 11, 2006 and St. John Medical Center from February 1, 2006 to February 8, 2006.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appellant was not eligible for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 1606, Title 10, United States Code because she left the Selected Reserve and entered the Individual Ready Reserve on September 4, 1991.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance under Chapter 30 was denied because he did not meet the required minimum period of continuous active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further evidentiary development regarding the appellant's military service and potential POW status.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's service-connected disabilities require regular aid and attendance or make him housebound.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The case is remanded for further development and consideration of apportionment to the appellant's daughter.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claims for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses were denied as the criteria for establishing entitlement under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725 and 38 C.F.R. § 17.1002 were not met.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.