Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2009
The Veteran is entitled to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for the fixed apical defect caused by VA medical treatment on November 8, 2001.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded for further development, including the scheduling of a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is being remanded to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC) for compliance with directives specified in a Court order.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The Board of Veterans' Appeals remanded the case to provide additional notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA) regarding evidence needed to establish that the appellant was a member of the Veteran's household at the time of his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran does not have a current cardiac disorder related to his service-connected recurrent rheumatic fever, with pericarditis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a Travel Board hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for arthritis of multiple joints, as there was no evidence showing that the condition was incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the etiology of the Veteran's left hip and leg complaints.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The case is remanded to obtain additional evidence regarding the overpayment of pension benefits and for reconsideration by the Committee on Waivers and Compromises.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for postoperative residuals of septorhinoplasty was denied as the evidence did not show a disability level warranting a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a cardiovascular disability, to include chest pain, as there was no evidence of such disease during his period of active duty and no medical evidence linking it to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The Board remands the claim for an examination to determine if the Veteran's liver disability is related to service or his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The veteran's gout is not shown to be more severe than currently evaluated, and an increased rating in excess of 20 percent is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to obtain the Veteran's terminal hospitalization records and provide corrective VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board found that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claim for service connection for a left indirect inguinal hernia, as the evidence did not associate any current left indirect inguinal hernia with the Veteran's military service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2009
The Veteran's service connection claim for a scar on the right upper eyelid, with associated complaints of pain, was granted. However, his claims for visual impairment and an 'echo' sound on breathing were denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The veteran's service-connected melasma of the cheeks and keloid of the chest do not warrant evaluations in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2009
The Board granted service connection for cardiomyopathy, resolving all reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is being remanded due to an inadequate nexus opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for initial ratings in excess of 10 percent for varicose veins, right and left lower extremities.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.