Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the veteran's claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claim for service connection for pulmonary fibrosis was denied because the evidence did not show that his condition was related to his military service, including asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral vascular disease, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between the condition and his active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities is being remanded for an appropriate VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The veteran withdrew his appeal, and the Board has no jurisdiction to review the claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied an effective date prior to November 19, 1999 for the grant of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death as a matter of law.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board found that the veteran's chronic diarrhea did not meet the criteria for a higher rating, as there was no evidence of more or less constant abdominal distress.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The Board granted service connection for a pre-existing bilateral leg and foot disability, finding that it was aggravated during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board found that the October 1973 rating decision denying service connection for a nervous disorder was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the previously denied claim of service connection for a lung condition related to asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The case is remanded to issue a statement of the case regarding entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for left leg trauma was denied as there is no evidence that the veteran's fall during his VA hospitalization caused additional disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to provide the veteran with a list of recognized representatives and forms for appointing one.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for right hip arthritis as it did not have its onset until many years after separation from active service, was not etiologically related to his active service, and was not caused or aggravated by his service-connected traumatic arthritis of the right ankle.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The Board finds that the veteran currently has a seizure disorder, that the seizure disorder had its onset in service, and that the veteran continued to have a seizure disorder following his discharge from service. Given the foregoing, service connection for a seizure disorder is warranted.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The claim for special monthly pension based on the need for aid and attendance, for accrued benefits purposes, is dismissed as there was no pending claim at the time of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a fractured jaw as there is no current disability related to the in-service injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claim for reimbursement of unauthorized private medical expenses was denied as the treatments were not rendered in a medical emergency and VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of the costs of unauthorized private medical treatment incurred on October 5-6, 2006 was denied because it did not meet the criteria under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1728 and 38 C.F.R. § 17.120.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.